Practice guidelines for diseases caused by Aspergillus

Aspergillosis comprises a variety of manifestations of infection. These guidelines are directed to 3 principal entities: invasive aspergillosis, involving several organ systems (particularly pulmonary disease); pulmonary aspergilloma; and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. The recommendations are distilled in this summary, but the reader is encouraged to review the more extensive discussions in subsequent sections, which show the strength of the recommendations and the quality of the evidence, and the original publications cited in detail. Invasive aspergillosis. Because it is highly lethal in the immunocompromised host. even in the face of therapy, work-up must be prompt and aggressive, and therapy may need to be initiated upon suspicion of the diagnosis, without definitive proof (BIII). Intravenous therapy should be: used initially in rapidly progressing disease (BIII). The largest therapeutic experience is with amphotericin B deoxycholate, which should be given at maximum tolerated doses (e.g., 1-1.5 mg/kg/d) and should be continued. despite modest increases in serum creatinine levels (BIII). Lipid formulations of amphotericin are indicated for the patient who has impaired renal Function or who develops nephrotoxicity while receiving deoxycholate amphotericin (AII). Oral itraconazole is an alternative for patients who can take oral medication. are likely to be adherent, can be demonstrated (by serum level monitoring) to absorb the drug, and lack the potential for interaction with other drugs (BII). Oral itraconazole is attractive for continuing therapy in the patient who responds to initial iv therapy (CIII). Therapy should be prolonged beyond resolution of disease and reversible underlying predispositions (BIII). Adjunctive therapy (particularly surgery and combination chemotherapy. also immunotherapy), may be useful in certain situations (CIII). Aspergilloma. The optimal treatment strategy for aspergilloma is unknown. Therapy is predominantly directed at preventing life-threatening hemoptysis. Surgical removal of aspergilloma is definitive treatment, but because of significant morbidity and mortality it should be reserved for high-risk patients such its those with episodes of life-threatening hemoptysis, and considered for patients with underlying sarcoidosis, immunocompromised patients, and those with increasing Asper Aspergillus-specific IgG titers (CIII). Surgical candidates would need to have adequate pulmonary function to undergo the operation. Bronchial artery embolization rarely produces a permanent success. but may be useful as a temporizing procedure in patients with life-threatening hemoptysis. Endobronchial and intracavitary instillation of antifungals or oral itraconazole may be useful for this condition. Since the majority of aspergillomas do not cause life-threatening hemoptysis, the morbidity and cost of treatment must be weighed against the clinical benefit. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (APBA). Although no well-designed studies have been carried out, the available data support the use of corticosteroids for acute exacerbations of ABPA (AII). Neither the optimal corticosteroid dose nor the duration of therapy has been standardized, but limited data suggest the starting dose should be similar to 0.5 mg/kg/d of prednisone. The decision to taper corticosteroids should be made on an individual basis, depending on the clinical course (BIII). The available data suggest that clinical symptoms alone are inadequate to make such decisions. since significant lung damage may occur in asymptomatic patients. Increasing serum IgE levels, new or worsening infiltrate on chest radiograph. and worsening spirometry suggest that corticosteroids should be used (BII). Multiple asthmatic exacerbations in a patient with ABPA suggest that chronic corticosteroid therapy should be used (BIII). Itraconazole appears useful as a corticosteroid sparing agent (BII). Although the frequency of these diseases is on the rise, there is a paucity of randomized comparative trials involving these entities; therefore, the recommendations represent a compromise and consensus among students of these diseases (i.e., the authors). They have synthesized the recommendations from published and personal experience, including case series, open trials, and any comparative trials, as indicated.