Detection of thrombosis in the portal venous system: Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography

被引:78
作者
Kreft, B
Strunk, H
Flacke, S
Wolff, M
Conrad, R
Gieseke, J
Pauleit, D
Bachmann, R
Hirner, A
Schild, HH
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Radiol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Dept Surg, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[3] Philips Med Syst, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
angiography; comparative studies; hypertension; portal; magnetic resonance (MR); vascular studies; portal vein; MR; thrombosis;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl2386
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine whether intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) can be replaced by contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of patency or thrombosis of the portal venous system in patients with portal hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with portal hypertension underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intraarterial DSA for assessment of the portal venous system. The images were evaluated for vessel patency orthrombosis of the portal, splenic, or superior mesenteric vein. RESULTS: Of the 101 vessels evaluated, 42 were thrombosed. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of thrombosis were 100%, 98%, and 99%, respectively, for MR angiography and 91%, 100%, and 96%, respectively, for DSA; differences between the imaging methods were not statistically significant. Only in four patients with six vessels (6%) were there discordant findings between MR angiography and DSA. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive contrast-enhanced MR angiography has the potential to replace intraarterial DSA as the standard method to assess the whole portal venous system.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
CAPASSO P, 1998, HEPATOBILIARY PANCRE, P294
[2]   Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: Usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector [J].
Earls, JP ;
Rofsky, NM ;
DeCorato, DR ;
Krinsky, GA ;
Weinreb, JC .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) :705-710
[3]   MR ANGIOGRAPHY AND DYNAMIC FLOW EVALUATION OF THE PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM [J].
EDELMAN, RR ;
ZHAO, B ;
LIU, C ;
WENTZ, KU ;
MATTLE, HP ;
FINN, JP ;
MCARDLE, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 153 (04) :755-760
[4]   LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION - MR ANGIOGRAPHY WITH SURGICAL VALIDATION [J].
FINN, JP ;
EDELMAN, RR ;
JENKINS, RL ;
LEWIS, WD ;
LONGMAID, HE ;
KANE, RA ;
STOKES, KR ;
MATTLE, HP ;
CLOUSE, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (01) :265-269
[5]   IMAGING OF THE PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS - MR-ANGIOGRAPHY VS DUPLEX-DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY [J].
FINN, JP ;
KANE, RA ;
EDELMAN, RR ;
JENKINS, RL ;
LEWIS, WD ;
MULLER, M ;
LONGMAID, HE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 161 (05) :989-994
[6]   Time-of-flight MR angiography of the portal venous system: Value compared with other imaging procedures [J].
Hughes, LA ;
Hartnell, GG ;
Finn, JP ;
Longmaid, HE ;
Volpe, J ;
Wheeler, HG ;
Clouse, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (02) :375-378
[7]   MR ANGIOGRAPHY IN PORTAL-HYPERTENSION - DETECTION OF VARICES AND IMAGING TECHNIQUES [J].
JOHNSON, CD ;
EHMAN, RL ;
RAKELA, J ;
ILSTRUP, DM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (04) :578-584
[8]   COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND, CT, AND MR-IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION OF CANDIDATES FOR TIPS [J].
KRAUS, BB ;
ROS, PR ;
ABBITT, PL ;
KERNS, SR ;
SABATELLI, FW .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (05) :571-578
[9]   Comparison of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and Doppler ultrasound in the pre-operative assessment of the portal venous system [J].
Naik, KS ;
Ward, J ;
Irving, HC ;
Robinson, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 :43-49
[10]   PHASE-CONTRAST MR-ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM - PREOPERATIVE FINDINGS IN LIVER-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS [J].
NGHIEM, HV ;
FREENY, PC ;
WINTER, TC ;
MACK, LA ;
YUAN, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (02) :445-450