Bridging chemical and biological space: "Target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors

被引:141
作者
Nettles, James H. [1 ]
Jenkins, Jeremy L. [1 ]
Bender, Andreas [1 ]
Deng, Zhan [1 ]
Davies, John W. [1 ]
Glick, Meir [1 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Inst BioMed Res Inc, Lead Discovery Informat, Lead Discovery Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jm060902w
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Bridging chemical and biological space is the key to drug discovery and development. Typically, cheminformatics methods operate under the assumption that similar chemicals have similar biological activity. Ideally then, one could predict a drug's biological function( s) given only its chemical structure by similarity searching in libraries of compounds with known activities. In practice, effectively choosing a similarity metric is case dependent. This work compares both 2D and 3D chemical descriptors as tools for predicting the biological targets of ligand probes, on the basis of their similarity to reference molecules in a 46 000 compound, biologically annotated chemical database. Overall, we found that the 2D methods employed here outperform the 3D ( 88% vs 67% success) in correct target prediction. However, the 3D descriptors proved superior in cases of probes with low structural similarity to other compounds in the database ( singletons). Additionally, the 3D method ( FEPOPS) shows promise for providing pharmacophoric alignment of the small molecules' chemical features consistent with those seen in experimental ligand/receptor complexes. These results suggest that querying annotated chemical databases with a systematic combination of both 2D and 3D descriptors will prove more effective than employing single methods.
引用
收藏
页码:6802 / 6810
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[21]  
Glen RC, 2006, IDRUGS, V9, P199
[22]  
GLICK M, 2006, IN PRESS J CHEM INF
[23]   Measuring CAMD technique performance: A virtual screening case study in the design of validation experiments [J].
Good, AC ;
Hermsmeier, MA ;
Hindle, SA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2004, 18 (7-9) :529-536
[24]   Descriptors you can count on? Normalized and filtered pharmacophore descriptors for virtual screening [J].
Good, AC ;
Cho, SJ ;
Mason, JS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2004, 18 (7-9) :523-527
[25]   Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures [J].
Hert, J ;
Willett, P ;
Wilton, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2004, 44 (03) :1177-1185
[26]   Morphological similarity: A 3D molecular similarity method correlated with protein-ligand recognition [J].
Jain, AN .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2000, 14 (02) :199-213
[27]   A 3D similarity method for scaffold hopping from the known drugs or natural ligands to new chemotypes [J].
Jenkins, JL ;
Glick, M ;
Davies, JW .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (25) :6144-6159
[28]   The structural basis for the specificity of retinoid-X receptor-selective agonists: New insights into the role of helix H12 [J].
Love, JD ;
Gooch, JT ;
Benko, S ;
Li, C ;
Nagy, L ;
Chatterjee, VKK ;
Evans, RM ;
Schwabe, JWR .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 277 (13) :11385-11391
[29]   Measuring molecular similarity and diversity: Total pharmacophore diversity [J].
Makara, GM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 44 (22) :3563-3571
[30]   Function of retinoid nuclear receptors. Lessons from genetic and pharmacological dissections of the retinoic acid signaling pathway during mouse embryogenesis [J].
Mark, M ;
Ghyselinck, NB ;
Chambon, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 46 :451-480