Biomass-based hydrogen production: A review and analysis

被引:414
作者
Kalinci, Yildiz [2 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [3 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Tech Programs, Izmir Vocat High Sch, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Univ Ontario, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Inst Technol, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Hydrogen energy; Biomass; Energy; Exergy; Efficiency; Gasification; Pyrolysis; Performance; CARBON-DIOXIDE CAPTURE; SUPERCRITICAL WATER; STEAM GASIFICATION; WOODY BIOMASS; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; RICH GAS; PYROLYSIS; GASIFIER; RESIDUES; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.078
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this study, various processes for conversion of biomass into hydrogen gas are comprehensively reviewed in terms of two main groups, namely (i) thermo-chemical processes (pyrolysis, conventional gasification, supercritical water gasification (SCWG)), and (ii) biological conversions (fermentative hydrogen production, photosynthesis, biological water gas shift reactions (BWGS)). Biomass-based hydrogen production systems are discussed in terms of their energetic and exergetic aspects. Literature studies and potential methods are then summarized for comparison purposes. in addition, a biomass gasification process via oxygen and steam in a downdraft gasifier is exergetically studied for performance assessment as a case study. The operating conditions and strategies are really important for better performance of the system for hydrogen production. A distinct range of temperatures and pressures is used, such as that the temperatures may vary from 480 to 1400 degrees C, while the pressures are in the range of 0.1-50 MPa in various thermo-chemical processes reviewed. For the operating conditions considered the data for steam biomass ratio (SBR) and equivalence ratio (ER) range from 0.6 to 10 and 0.1 to 0.4, respectively. In the study considered, steam is used as the gasifying agent with a product gas heating value of about 10-1S MJ/Nm(3), compared to an air gasification of biomass process with 3-6 MJ/Nm(3). The exergy efficiency value for the case study system is calculated to be 56.8%, while irreversibility and improvement potential rates are found to be 670.43 and 288.28 kW, respectively. Also, exergetic fuel and product rates of the downdraft gasifier are calculated as 1572.08 and 901.64 kW, while fuel depletion and productivity lack ratios are 43% and 74.3%, respectively. (C) 2009 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8799 / 8817
页数:19
相关论文
共 67 条
[11]  
COCCO G, 1988, RIV COMBUST, V42, P255
[12]  
COX JL, 1995, P 2 BIOM C AM PORTL
[13]   Hydrogen from biomass-production by steam reforming of biomass pyrolysis oil [J].
Czernik, Stefan ;
Evans, Robert ;
French, Richard .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2007, 129 (3-4) :265-268
[14]   Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature [J].
Das, D ;
Veziroglu, TN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2001, 26 (01) :13-28
[15]   Environmental and sustainability aspects of hydrogen and fuel cell systems [J].
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2007, 31 (01) :29-55
[16]   Gasification of sewage sludge using a throated downdraft gasifier and uncertainty analysis [J].
Dogru, M ;
Midilli, A ;
Howarth, CR .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 75 (01) :55-82
[17]  
*EIA, HYDR
[18]   Enhanced hydrogen production from biomass with in situ carbon dioxide capture using calcium oxide sorbents [J].
Florin, Nicholas H. ;
Harris, Andrew T. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2008, 63 (02) :287-316
[19]   Hydrogen production from biomass coupled with carbon dioxide capture: The implications of thermodynamic equilibrium [J].
Florin, Nicholas H. ;
Harris, Andrew T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (17) :4119-4134
[20]   A kinetic study of in situ CO2 removal gasification of woody biomass for hydrogen production [J].
Fujimoto, Shinji ;
Yoshida, Takahiro ;
Hanaoka, Toshiaki ;
Matsumura, Yukihiko ;
Lin, Shi-Ying ;
Minowa, Tomoaki ;
Sasaki, Yoshlyuki .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2007, 31 (08) :556-562