The crisis in US and international cancer policy

被引:7
作者
Epstein, SS [1 ]
Ashford, NA [1 ]
Blackwelder, B [1 ]
Castleman, B [1 ]
Cohen, G [1 ]
Goldsmith, E [1 ]
Mazzocchi, A [1 ]
Young, QD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES | 2002年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1092/4F8C-QW9W-QDHG-2R4F
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The incidence of cancer in the United States and other major industrialized nations has escalated to epidemic proportions over recent decades, and greater increases are expected. While smoking is the single largest cause of cancer, the incidence of childhood cancers and a wide range of predominantly nonsmoking-related cancers in men and women has increased greatly. This modem epidemic does not reflect lack of resources of the U.S. cancer establishment, the National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society; the NCI budget has increased 20-fold since passage of the 1971 National Cancer Act, while funding for research and public information on primary prevention remains minimal. The cancer establishment bears major responsibility for the cancer epidemic, due to its overwhelming fixation on damage control-screening, diagnosis, treatment, and related molecular research-and indifference to preventing a wide range of avoidable causes of cancer, other than faulty lifestyle, particularly smoking. This mindset is based on a discredited 1981 report by a prominent pro-industry epidemiologist, guesstimating that environmental and occupational exposures were responsible for only 5 percent of cancer mortality, even though a prior chemical industry report admitted. that 20 percent was occupational in origin. This report still dominates public policy, despite overwhelming contrary scientific evidence on avoidable causes of cancer from involuntary exposures to a wide range of environmental carcinogens. Since 1998, the ACS has been planning to gain control of national cancer policy, now under federal authority. These plans, developed behind closed doors and under conditions of nontransparency, with recent well-intentioned but mistaken bipartisan Congressional support, pose a major and poorly reversible threat to cancer prevention and to winning the losing war against cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 707
页数:39
相关论文
共 61 条
[41]  
*NAT CANC I, 2001, CANC FACTS
[42]  
*NAT CANC I, 2001, CANC PROGR REP
[43]  
*NAT CANC I AM CAN, 1998, REP CARD
[44]  
*NAT TOX PROGR, 1995, TECHN REP SER, V439
[45]  
Ries L.A., 2002, SEER CANC STAT REV 1
[46]  
*SIERR CLUB CAN CA, 2002, ENV JOIN CAN CANC SO
[47]  
STALLONES RA, 1979, CRITICAL REV ESTIMAT
[48]  
STOLBERG SG, 1998, NY TIMES 0313
[49]  
Tomatis L, 2002, INT J OCCUP ENV HEAL, V8, P144
[50]  
WHITE J, 2002, COMMUNICATION 0409