Views of American oncologists about the purposes of clinical trials

被引:80
作者
Joffe, S
Weeks, JC
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Outcomes & Policy Res, Dept Pediat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Adult Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2002年 / 94卷 / 24期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/94.24.1847
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Many research subjects believe incorrectly that the primary purpose of clinical trials is to benefit the-participants rather than to improve therapy for future patients. However, few data are available about how physicians view trials. Methods: We mailed surveys to a stratified random sample (n = 1120) of U.S. medical, pediatric, and other oncology specialists who were selected from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Membership Directory. Respondents were asked to select, from a list of options, their reasons for enrolling individual patients in trials and what they thought the main societal purposes of clinical trials are. We used logistic regression models to evaluate which demographic and clinical practice characteristics were associated with responses to these questions. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Of the 547 physicians (48.8%) who responded, 40.5% of the medical oncologists, 32.3% of the pediatric oncologists, and 62.6% of the other oncology subspecialists reported enrolling individual patients in clinical trials to improve future therapy. Most of the other respondents reported enrolling patients to ensure that they received state-of-the-art treatment. When asked about the main societal purpose of clinical trials, 72.7% of the medical oncologists, 59.4% of the pediatric oncologists, and 81.9% of the other oncology subspecialists cited improving future therapy; most of the other respondents cited ensuring state-of-the-art treatment for participants. In multivariable analysis, medical oncologists (odds ratio [OR] = 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3 to 0.9) and pediatric oncologists (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.5) were less likely than other oncologists to identify improving future therapy as the main societal purpose of clinical trials, whereas industry physicians (OR = 4.6, 95 % CI = 1.1 to 20.5) chose this option more often than physicians who did not work for industry. Conclusions: Many respondents viewed the main societal purpose of clinical trials as benefiting the participants rather than as creating generalizable knowledge to advance future therapy. This view, which was more prevalent among specialists such as pediatric oncologists that enrolled greater proportions of patients in trials, conflicts with established principles of research ethics.
引用
收藏
页码:1847 / 1853
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, FIN REP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, The Patient as Partner: A Theory of Human-Experimentation Ethics
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INFORMED CONSENT LEG
[4]   THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION - INFORMED CONSENT IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 1982, 5 (3-4) :319-329
[5]   FALSE HOPES AND BEST DATA - CONSENT TO RESEARCH AND THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, CW ;
BENSON, P ;
WINSLADE, W .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1987, 17 (02) :20-24
[6]   KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES OF GENERALIST AND SPECIALIST PHYSICIANS REGARDING DRUG-THERAPY FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
AYANIAN, JZ ;
HAUPTMAN, PJ ;
GUADAGNOLI, E ;
ANTMAN, EM ;
PASHOS, CL ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (17) :1136-1142
[7]   Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography - Do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? [J].
Ayanian, JZ ;
Landrum, MB ;
Normand, SLT ;
Guadagnoli, E ;
McNeil, BJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (26) :1896-1904
[8]   Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington State - Patient requests and physician responses [J].
Back, AL ;
Wallace, JI ;
Starks, HE ;
Pearlman, RA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (12) :919-925
[9]   Managed care and oncology: The quality debate [J].
Bailes, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (04) :705-707
[10]   INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, SUBJECT UNDERSTANDING, AND INFORMED CONSENT IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH [J].
BENSON, PR ;
ROTH, LH ;
APPELBAUM, PS ;
LIDZ, CW ;
WINSLADE, WJ .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1988, 12 (04) :455-475