Views of American oncologists about the purposes of clinical trials

被引:80
作者
Joffe, S
Weeks, JC
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Outcomes & Policy Res, Dept Pediat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Adult Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2002年 / 94卷 / 24期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/94.24.1847
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Many research subjects believe incorrectly that the primary purpose of clinical trials is to benefit the-participants rather than to improve therapy for future patients. However, few data are available about how physicians view trials. Methods: We mailed surveys to a stratified random sample (n = 1120) of U.S. medical, pediatric, and other oncology specialists who were selected from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Membership Directory. Respondents were asked to select, from a list of options, their reasons for enrolling individual patients in trials and what they thought the main societal purposes of clinical trials are. We used logistic regression models to evaluate which demographic and clinical practice characteristics were associated with responses to these questions. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Of the 547 physicians (48.8%) who responded, 40.5% of the medical oncologists, 32.3% of the pediatric oncologists, and 62.6% of the other oncology subspecialists reported enrolling individual patients in clinical trials to improve future therapy. Most of the other respondents reported enrolling patients to ensure that they received state-of-the-art treatment. When asked about the main societal purpose of clinical trials, 72.7% of the medical oncologists, 59.4% of the pediatric oncologists, and 81.9% of the other oncology subspecialists cited improving future therapy; most of the other respondents cited ensuring state-of-the-art treatment for participants. In multivariable analysis, medical oncologists (odds ratio [OR] = 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3 to 0.9) and pediatric oncologists (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.5) were less likely than other oncologists to identify improving future therapy as the main societal purpose of clinical trials, whereas industry physicians (OR = 4.6, 95 % CI = 1.1 to 20.5) chose this option more often than physicians who did not work for industry. Conclusions: Many respondents viewed the main societal purpose of clinical trials as benefiting the participants rather than as creating generalizable knowledge to advance future therapy. This view, which was more prevalent among specialists such as pediatric oncologists that enrolled greater proportions of patients in trials, conflicts with established principles of research ethics.
引用
收藏
页码:1847 / 1853
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey [J].
Joffe, S ;
Cook, EF ;
Cleary, PD ;
Clark, JW ;
Weeks, JC .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9295) :1772-1777
[22]  
Katz Jay, 1993, St Louis Univ Law J, V38, P7
[23]   The "inclusion benefit" in clinical trials [J].
Lantos, JD .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1999, 134 (02) :130-131
[24]  
Levine R.J., 1988, ETHICS REGULATION CL, V2nd
[25]   Medical students' attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide [J].
Mangus, RS ;
Dipiero, A ;
Hawkins, CE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (21) :2080-2081
[26]   The controversy over high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant for breast cancer [J].
Mello, MM ;
Brennan, TA .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (05) :101-117
[27]   Professional integrity in clinical research [J].
Miller, FG ;
Rosenstein, DL ;
DeRenzo, EG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (16) :1449-1454
[28]   Phase I cancer trials -: A collusion of misunderstanding [J].
Miller, M .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2000, 30 (04) :34-43
[29]  
National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 2001, ETH POL ISS INT RES, P48
[30]   RISK-BENEFIT RELATIONSHIPS IN CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS - THE ECOG EXPERIENCE IN NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
SIMES, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1985, 3 (04) :462-472