Present status and future of nematode systematics

被引:61
作者
Coomans, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Biol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1163/15685410260438836
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Since phylogenetic systematics became generally accepted and especially since informatics and molecular techniques for phylogenetic analysis were developed, systematics has undergone a conceptual and methodological revolution. Taxonomy, on the contrary, suffered a decline. Poor descriptions, too much routine work and low citation rates hampered it. As a result, the discipline became less attractive to young scientists. With only a small fraction of the biodiversity known, this situation will lead to serious problems in the future in all those fields of nematology depending on a correct identification of species. Phylogenetic analyses of nematodes have been mainly based on morphology, supplemented with developmental characters, but in recent years molecular methods have provided entirely new data sets. Phylogenetic estimates derived from independent data may provide new insights in character homologies through reciprocal illumination. Classifications of nematodes were often biased according to the expertise of the author and were only recently based on the principles of phylogenetic systematics. Recently, molecular and morphological data have been used to support a new overall classification with only (presumably) monophyletic taxa. In this classification plant, as well as animal, parasitic taxa are hierarchically downgraded in accordance with their phylogenetic history. Species occupy an important position in all aspects of biology, therefore the species concept matters. It determines, for example, the outcome of biodiversity assessments, distribution patterns, etc. However, several problems remain to be solved before a consensus will be reached about the choice of a concept. Future research in nematode systematics should comprise well-focused taxonomy based on a combination of classical and modern methods in a way that can raise the interest of young scientists as well as of funding agencies. It should be realised that, with the dwindling present taxonomic expertise, this is a very urgent matter.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 582
页数:10
相关论文
共 96 条
[51]  
LAMBSHEAD PJD, 1993, OCEANIS S D, V19, P5
[52]   Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest [J].
Lawton, JH ;
Bignell, DE ;
Bolton, B ;
Bloemers, GF ;
Eggleton, P ;
Hammond, PM ;
Hodda, M ;
Holt, RD ;
Larsen, TB ;
Mawdsley, NA ;
Stork, NE ;
Srivastava, DS ;
Watt, AD .
NATURE, 1998, 391 (6662) :72-76
[53]  
LEWIN R, 1997, PATTERNS EVOLUTION N
[54]   Inferring a classification of the Adenophorea (Nematoda) from nucleotide sequences of the D3 expansion segment (26/28S rDNA) [J].
Litvaitis, MK ;
Bates, JW ;
Hope, WD ;
Moens, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 2000, 78 (06) :911-922
[55]  
Lorenzen S., 1994, The phylogenetic systematics of free living nematodes.
[56]  
LORENZEN S, 1981, VEROFFENTLICHUNGEN S, P1
[57]   SPECIES CONCEPTS - ASSUMPTIONS, METHODS, AND APPLICATIONS [J].
LUCKOW, M .
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 1995, 20 (04) :589-605
[58]  
MAGGENTI A. R., 1963, The lower Metazoa: comparative biology and phylogeny., P273
[59]  
MAGGENTI AR, 1983, CONCEPTS NEMATODE SY, V22, P25
[60]  
Malakhov V., 1994, Nematodes. Structure, development, classification and phylogeny.