Interactions of multiple predators with different foraging modes in an aquatic food web

被引:32
作者
Carey, Michael P. [1 ,2 ]
Wahl, David H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Sam Parr Biol Stn, Kinmundy, IL 62854 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Program Ecol Evolut & Conservat Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Multiple predators; Risk-enhanced effect; Additive design; Substitution design; BASS MICROPTERUS-SALMOIDES; LARGEMOUTH BASS; TROPHIC INTERACTIONS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; HABITAT COMPLEXITY; PREY INTERACTIONS; ESOX MASQUINONGY; NORTHERN PIKE; OPEN-WATER; BODY SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-009-1461-3
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Top predators can have different foraging modes that may alter their interactions and effects on food webs. Interactions between predators may be non-additive resulting from facilitation or interference, whereas their combined effects on a shared prey may result in emergent effects that are risk enhanced or risk reduced. To test the importance of multiple predators with different foraging modes, we examined the interaction between a cruising predator (largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides) and an ambush predator (muskellunge, Esox masquinongy) foraging on a shared prey (bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus) with strong anti-predator defense behaviors. Additive and substitution designs were used to compare individual to combined predator treatments in experimental ponds. The multiple predator interaction facilitated growth of the cruising predator in the combined predator treatments, whereas predator species had substitutable effects on the growth of the ambush predator. The combined predator treatments created an emergent effect on the prey; however, the direction was dependent on the experimental design. The additive design found a risk-reducing effect, whereas the substitution design found a risk-enhancing effect for prey fish. Indirect effects from the predators weakly extended to lower trophic levels (i.e., zooplankton community). Our results highlight the need to consider differences in foraging mode of top predators, interactions between predators, and emergent effects on prey to understand food webs.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 452
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [11] Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs
    Elser, JJ
    Fagan, WF
    Denno, RF
    Dobberfuhl, DR
    Folarin, A
    Huberty, A
    Interlandi, S
    Kilham, SS
    McCauley, E
    Schulz, KL
    Siemann, EH
    Sterner, RW
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 408 (6812) : 578 - 580
  • [12] Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades
    Finke, DL
    Denno, RF
    [J]. NATURE, 2004, 429 (6990) : 407 - 410
  • [13] RECIPROCAL OSCILLATIONS IN DENSITIES OF LARVAL FISH AND POTENTIAL PREDATORS - A REFLECTION OF PRESENT OR PAST PREDATION
    FRANK, KT
    LEGGETT, WC
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1985, 42 (11) : 1841 - 1849
  • [14] Energetics, predation, and ration affect size-dependent growth and mortality of fish during winter
    Garvey, JE
    Ostrand, KG
    Wahl, DH
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (10) : 2860 - 2871
  • [15] GILLEN AL, 1981, T AM FISH SOC, V110, P197, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1981)110<197:PBPTMO>2.0.CO
  • [16] 2
  • [17] HABITAT SELECTION UNDER PREDATION HAZARD - TEST OF A MODEL WITH FORAGING MINNOWS
    GILLIAM, JF
    FRASER, DF
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1987, 68 (06) : 1856 - 1862
  • [18] Goldberg D.E., 1993, DESIGN ANAL ECOLOGIC, P183
  • [19] Detecting emergent effects of multiple predator species
    Griffen, Blaine D.
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 2006, 148 (04) : 702 - 709
  • [20] Griswold MW, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P987, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[987:PIAAEI]2.0.CO