Immunohistochemical Surrogate Markers of Breast Cancer Molecular Classes Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy A Single Institutional Experience With 359 Cases

被引:119
作者
Bhargava, Rohit [1 ]
Beriwal, Sushil [2 ]
Dabbs, David J. [1 ]
Ozbek, Umut [3 ]
Soran, Atilla [4 ]
Johnson, Ronald R. [4 ]
Brufsky, Adam M. [5 ]
Lembersky, Barry C. [5 ]
Ahrendt, Gretchen M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
immunohistochemical surrogate markers; breast cancer molecular classes; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathologic complete response; survival; PREOPERATIVE THERAPY; SYSTEMIC TREATMENT; CARCINOMA; SUBTYPES; FEATURES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.24876
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is predominantly seen in "ERBB2" and "basal-like" tumors using expression profiling. We hypothesize that a similar response could be predicted using semiquantitative immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). METHODS: ER, PR, and HER2 were used to classify 359 tumors treated with NACT into 6 groups: luminal A (strong ER+, HER2 negative), luminal B (weak to moderate ER+, HER2 negative), triple negative (negative for ER, PR, and HER2), ERBB2 (negative for ER and PR, but HER2+), luminal A-HER2 hybrid (strong ER+ and HER2+), and luminal B-HER2 hybrid (weak to moderate ER+ and HER2+). Complete pathologic response was defined as absence of invasive carcinoma in the breast and regional lymph nodes. RESULTS: Thirteen percent (48 of 359) demonstrated complete pathologic response. The highest rate of complete pathologic response was seen in ERBB2 (33%; 19 of 57) and triple negative (30%; 24 of 79) tumor classes. Among the ER+ "molecular" group, the highest rate of complete pathologic response was seen among luminal B-HER2 hybrid tumors, 8% (2 of 24). Remainder of ER+ tumors demonstrated a very low rate of complete pathologic response, 1.5% (3 of 198). The 5-year survival for patients achieving complete pathologic response was 96% compared with 75% in patients that failed to achieve complete pathologic response. The overall survival was worse in the ER-negative group (ERBB2 and triple negative) compared with the ER-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the recently defined "triple negative paradox," or rather "hormone receptor negative paradox," that despite the best response to NACT, ERBB2 and triple negative tumors show the worst overall survival because of higher relapse among those with residual disease. Cancer 2010;116:1431-9. (C) 2070 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1439
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Luminal B breast tumors are not HER2 positive [J].
Bhargava, Rohit ;
Dabbs, David J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (05)
[2]  
Bhargava R, 2009, INT J CLIN EXP PATHO, V2, P444
[3]   The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Dees, E. Claire ;
Sawyer, Lynda ;
Gatti, Lisa ;
Moore, Dominic T. ;
Collichio, Frances ;
Ollila, David W. ;
Sartor, Carolyn I. ;
Graham, Mark L. ;
Perou, Charles M. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (08) :2329-2334
[4]   Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Livasy, Chad A. ;
Dressler, Lynn G. ;
Cowan, David ;
Conway, Kathleen ;
Karaca, Gamze ;
Troester, Melissa A. ;
Tse, Chiu Kit ;
Edmiston, Sharon ;
Deming, Sandra L. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Moorman, Patricia G. ;
Earp, H. Shelton ;
Millikan, Robert C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2492-2502
[5]   Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value then triple-negative phenotype [J].
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Voduc, David ;
Bajdik, Chris ;
Leung, Samuel ;
McKinney, Steven ;
Chia, Stephen K. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (05) :1368-1376
[6]   Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX™ Recurrence Score [J].
Flanagan, Melina B. ;
Dabbs, David J. ;
Brufsky, Adam M. ;
Beriwal, Sushil ;
Bhargava, Rohit .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2008, 21 (10) :1255-1261
[7]   Specific morphological features predictive for the basal phenotype in grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma of breast [J].
Fulford, L. G. ;
Easton, D. F. ;
Reis-Filho, J. S. ;
Sofronis, A. ;
Gillett, C. E. ;
Lakhani, S. R. ;
Hanby, A. .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 49 (01) :22-34
[8]  
Gonzalez-Angulo AM, 2007, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V608, P1
[9]   Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: Pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease [J].
Gralow, Julie R. ;
Burstein, Harold J. ;
Wood, William ;
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. ;
Gianni, Luca ;
Von Minckwitz, Gunter ;
Buzdar, Aman U. ;
Smith, Ian E. ;
Symmans, William F. ;
Singh, Baljit ;
Winer, Eric P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (05) :814-819
[10]   Primary docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: impact on response and survival [J].
Heys, SD ;
Sarkar, T ;
Hutcheon, AW .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 90 (02) :169-185