Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research

被引:201
作者
Bondas, Terese [1 ]
Hall, Elisabeth O. C.
机构
[1] Univ Coll Boras, Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
metasynthesis; meta-ethnography; metasummary; qualitative methods;
D O I
10.1177/1049732306295879
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the development of metasynthesis through an analysis of the challenges involved. The study grew out of the critique of qualitative metaresearch raised by current developers of metamethodologies. Different views on the application of methodologies have emerged in the literature, contributing to confusion and ambiguity concerning the challenging questions of what, why, how, and who in metasynthesis research, which might increase the risk of misunderstanding. The roots of metasynthesis research are seen as multifaceted and influencing the development of the methods in different directions. The primary worth of metasynthesis is theoretical and/or methodological development (synthesis) combined with the potential for reflection: going beyond and behind the studies (meta). Metasynthesis research has also the potential to raise questions of research collaboration, culture, and language.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 121
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [11] Bondas T., 2005, Trends in midwifery research, P119
  • [12] Bondas Terese E, 2003, Nurs Adm Q, V27, P249
  • [13] Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care
    Campbell, R
    Pound, P
    Pope, C
    Britten, N
    Pill, R
    Morgan, M
    Donovan, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (04) : 671 - 684
  • [14] Campinha-Bacote J., 2011, International Journal for Human Caring, V15, P42, DOI [10.20467/1091-5710.15.3.42, DOI 10.20467/1091-5710.3.1.37]
  • [15] Grey literature in meta-analyses
    Conn, VS
    Valentine, JC
    Cooper, HM
    Rantz, MJ
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2003, 52 (04) : 256 - 261
  • [16] Beyond MEDLINE for literature searches
    Conn, VS
    Isaramalai, SA
    Rath, S
    Jantarakupt, P
    Wadhawan, R
    Dash, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2003, 35 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [17] COOPER H, 1988, SYNTHESIZING RES
  • [18] Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews: introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise
    Edwards, A
    Elwyn, G
    Hood, K
    Rollnick, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2000, 6 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [19] Estabrooks C.A., 1994, Qualitative Health Research, V4, P503, DOI [10.1177/104973239400400410, DOI 10.1177/104973239400400410]
  • [20] Systematic reviews: gatekeepers of nursing knowledge
    Evans, D
    Pearson, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2001, 10 (05) : 593 - 599