Liver Transplantation Cost in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Era: Looking Beyond the Transplant Admission

被引:67
作者
Buchanan, Paula [2 ]
Dzebisashvili, Nino [2 ]
Lentine, Krista L. [2 ]
Axelrod, David A. [2 ,3 ]
Schnitzler, Mark A. [2 ]
Salvalaggio, Paolo R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Surg, Div Transplant Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Hanover, NH USA
关键词
KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MELD; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; ALLOCATION; RECIPIENTS; SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/lt.21802
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We examined the relationship between the total cost incurred by liver transplantation (LT) recipients and their Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the time of transplant. We used a novel database linking billing claims from a large private payer with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry. Included were adults who underwent LT from March 2002 through August 2007 (n = 990). Claims within the year preceding and following transplantation were analyzed according to the recipient's calculated MELD score. Cost was the primary endpoint and was assessed by the length of stay and charges. Transplant admission charges represented approximately 50% of the total cost of LT. MELD was a significant cost driver for pretransplant, transplant, and total charges. A MELD score of 28 to 40 was associated with additional charges of $349,213 (P < 0.05) in comparison with a score of 15 to 20. Pretransplant and transplant admission charges were higher by $152,819 (P < 0.05) and $64,286 (P < 0.05), respectively, in this higher MELD group. No differences by MELD score were found for posttransplant charges. Those in the highest MELD group also experienced longer hospital stays both in the pretransplant period and at the time of LT but did not have higher rates of re-admissions. In conclusion, high-MELD patients incur significantly higher costs prior to and at the time of LT. Following LT, the MELD score is not a significant predictor of cost or re-admission. Liver Transpl 15:1270-1277, 2009. (C) 2009 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:1270 / 1277
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Financial outcomes in transplantation - A provider's perspective [J].
Abecassis, MM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (06) :1257-1263
[2]   Incremental costs of post-liver transplantation complications [J].
Ammori, John B. ;
Pelletier, Shawn J. ;
Lynch, Raymond ;
Cohn, Joshua ;
Ads, Yasser ;
Campbell, Darrell A. ;
Englesbe, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 206 (01) :89-95
[3]   The economic impact of MELD on liver transplant centers [J].
Axelrod, DA ;
Koffron, AJ ;
Baker, T ;
Al-Saden, P ;
Dixler, I ;
McNatt, G ;
Sumner, S ;
Vaci, M ;
Abecassis, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (09) :2297-2301
[4]  
BONSEL GJ, 1990, TRANSPLANT P, V22, P1481
[5]   Predictors of the cost of liver transplantation [J].
Brown, RS ;
Lake, JR ;
Ascher, NL ;
Emond, JC ;
Roberts, JP .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION AND SURGERY, 1998, 4 (02) :170-176
[6]  
CECKA JM, 1995, CLIN TRANSPLANT, P315
[7]  
CECKA JM, 1996, CLIN TRANSPLANT, P315
[8]   Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: Utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function [J].
Desai, NM ;
Mange, KC ;
Crawford, MD ;
Abt, PL ;
Frank, AM ;
Markmann, JW ;
Velidedeoglu, E ;
Chapman, WC ;
Markmann, JF .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (01) :99-106
[9]   Proceedings of consensus conference on simultaneous liver kidney transplantation (SLK) [J].
Eason, J. D. ;
Gonwa, T. A. ;
Davis, C. L. ;
Sung, R. S. ;
Gerber, D. ;
Bloom, R. D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 (11) :2243-2251
[10]   Who pays for biliary complications following liver transplant? A business case for quality improvement [J].
Englesbe, M. J. ;
Dimick, J. ;
Mathur, A. ;
Ads, Y. ;
Welling, T. H. ;
Pelletier, S. J. ;
Heidt, D. G. ;
Magee, J. C. ;
Sung, R. S. ;
Punch, J. D. ;
Hanto, D. W. ;
Campbell, D. A., Jr. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (12) :2978-2982