Neutrophil traction stresses are concentrated in the uropod during migration

被引:88
作者
Smith, Lee A.
Aranda-Espinoza, Helim
Haun, Jered B.
Dembo, Micah
Hammer, Daniel A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Bioengn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Bioengn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1529/biophysj.106.102822
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
We find that in contrast to strongly adherent, slow moving cells such as fibroblasts, neutrophils exert contractile stresses largely in the rear of the cell ( uropod) relative to the direction of motion. Rather than the leading edge pulling the cell, the rear is both anchoring the cell and the area in which the contractile forces are concentrated. These tractions rapidly reorient themselves during a turn, on a timescale of seconds to minutes, and their repositioning precedes and sets the direction of motion during a turn. We find the total average rootmean-squared traction force to be 28 +/- 10 nN during chemokinesis, and 67 +/- 10 nN during chemotaxis. We hypothesize that the contraction forces in the back of the neutrophil not only break uropodial adhesive contacts but also create a rearward squeezing contractility, as seen in amoeboid or amoeboidlike cells and the formation of blebs in cells, causing a flow of intracellular material to the fluidlike lamellipod. Our findings suggest an entirely new model of neutrophil locomotion.
引用
收藏
页码:L58 / L60
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype [J].
Paszek, MJ ;
Zahir, N ;
Johnson, KR ;
Lakins, JN ;
Rozenberg, GI ;
Gefen, A ;
Reinhart-King, CA ;
Margulies, SS ;
Dembo, M ;
Boettiger, D ;
Hammer, DA ;
Weaver, VM .
CANCER CELL, 2005, 8 (03) :241-254
[12]   Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments [J].
Pollard, TD ;
Borisy, GG .
CELL, 2003, 112 (04) :453-465
[13]   The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading [J].
Reinhart-King, CA ;
Dembo, M ;
Hammer, DA .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 89 (01) :676-689
[14]  
Sengupta K, 2006, BIOPHYS J, V91, P4638, DOI 10.1529/biophysj.106.080382
[15]   A STOCHASTIC-MODEL FOR LEUKOCYTE RANDOM MOTILITY AND CHEMOTAXIS BASED ON RECEPTOR-BINDING FLUCTUATIONS [J].
TRANQUILLO, RT ;
LAUFFENBURGER, DA ;
ZIGMOND, SH .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1988, 106 (02) :303-309
[16]   To stabilize neutrophil polarity, PIP3 and Cdc42 augment RhoA activity at the back as well as signals at the front [J].
Van Keymeulen, Alexandra ;
Wong, Kit ;
Knight, Zachary A. ;
Govaerts, Cedric ;
Hahn, Klaus M. ;
Shokat, Kevan M. ;
Bourne, Henry R. .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 2006, 174 (03) :437-445
[17]   Divergent signals and cytoskeletal assemblies regulate self-organizing polarity in neutrophils [J].
Xu, JS ;
Wang, F ;
Van Keymeulen, A ;
Herzmark, P ;
Straight, A ;
Kelly, K ;
Takuwa, Y ;
Sugimoto, N ;
Mitchison, T ;
Bourne, HR .
CELL, 2003, 114 (02) :201-214
[18]   Regional rheological differences in locomoting neutrophils [J].
Yanai, M ;
Butler, JP ;
Suzuki, T ;
Sasaki, H ;
Higuchi, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 287 (03) :C603-C611
[19]  
Yanai M, 1996, CELL MOTIL CYTOSKEL, V33, P22
[20]   Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion [J].
Yeung, T ;
Georges, PC ;
Flanagan, LA ;
Marg, B ;
Ortiz, M ;
Funaki, M ;
Zahir, N ;
Ming, WY ;
Weaver, V ;
Janmey, PA .
CELL MOTILITY AND THE CYTOSKELETON, 2005, 60 (01) :24-34