The metabolic response of heterotrophic Arabidopsis cells to oxidative stress

被引:217
作者
Baxter, Charles J.
Redestig, Henning
Schauer, Nicolas
Repsilber, Dirk
Patil, Kiran R.
Nielsen, Jens
Selbig, Joachim
Liu, Junli
Fernie, Alisdair R.
Sweetlove, Lee J.
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Plant Sci, Oxford OX1 3RB, England
[2] Max Planck Inst Mol Plant Physiol, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Bioctr, Ctr Microbial Biotechnol, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[4] Scottish Crop Res Inst, Genet Program, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1104/pp.106.090431
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
To cope with oxidative stress, the metabolic network of plant cells must be reconfigured either to bypass damaged enzymes or to support adaptive responses. To characterize the dynamics of metabolic change during oxidative stress, heterotrophic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) cells were treated with menadione and changes in metabolite abundance and C-13-labeling kinetics were quantified in a time series of samples taken over a 6 h period. Oxidative stress had a profound effect on the central metabolic pathways with extensive metabolic inhibition radiating from the tricarboxylic acid cycle and including large sectors of amino acid metabolism. Sequential accumulation of metabolites in specific pathways indicated a subsequent backing up of glycolysis and a diversion of carbon into the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway. Microarray analysis revealed a coordinated transcriptomic response that represents an emergency coping strategy allowing the cell to survive the metabolic hiatus. Rather than attempt to replace inhibited enzymes, transcripts encoding these enzymes are in fact down-regulated while an antioxidant defense response is mounted. In addition, a major switch from anabolic to catabolic metabolism is signaled. Metabolism is also reconfigured to bypass damaged steps (e. g. induction of an external NADH dehydrogenase of the mitochondrial respiratory chain). The overall metabolic response of Arabidopsis cells to oxidative stress is remarkably similar to the superoxide and hydrogen peroxide stimulons of bacteria and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), suggesting that the stress regulatory and signaling pathways of plants and microbes may share common elements.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 325
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus [J].
Allison, DB ;
Cui, XQ ;
Page, GP ;
Sabripour, M .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2006, 7 (01) :55-65
[2]   Anoxia pretreatment protects soybean cells against H2O2-induced cell death:: possible involvement of peroxidases and of alternative oxidase [J].
Amor, Y ;
Chevion, M ;
Levine, A .
FEBS LETTERS, 2000, 477 (03) :175-180
[3]   Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction [J].
Apel, K ;
Hirt, H .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2004, 55 :373-399
[4]   Comparison of changes in fruit gene expression in tomato introgression lines provides evidence of genome-wide transcriptional changes and reveals links to mapped QTLs and described traits [J].
Baxter, CJ ;
Sabar, M ;
Quick, WP ;
Sweetlove, LJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2005, 56 (416) :1591-1604
[5]   arrayMagic:: two-colour cDNA microarray quality control and preprocessing [J].
Buness, A ;
Huber, W ;
Steiner, K ;
Sültmann, H ;
Poustka, A .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (04) :554-556
[6]   The zinc-finger protein Zat12 plays a central role in reactive oxygen and abiotic stress signaling in Arabidopsis [J].
Davletova, S ;
Schlauch, K ;
Coutu, J ;
Mittler, R .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 139 (02) :847-856
[7]   Regulation of the Arabidopsis transcriptome by oxidative stress [J].
Desikan, R ;
Mackerness, SAH ;
Hancock, JT ;
Neill, SJ .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 127 (01) :159-172
[8]   Plant glutathione transferases [J].
Dixon, David P. ;
Lapthorn, Adrian ;
Edwards, Robert .
GENOME BIOLOGY, 2002, 3 (03)
[9]   Enzymes, metabolites and fluxes [J].
Fell, DA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2005, 56 (410) :267-272
[10]   Flux an important, but neglected, component of functional glenomics [J].
Fernie, AR ;
Geigenberger, P ;
Stitt, M .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2005, 8 (02) :174-182