Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: First 100 patients with one year of follow-up

被引:55
作者
Mikhail, Albert A. [1 ]
Orvieto, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Billatos, Ehab S. [1 ]
Zorn, Kevin C. [1 ]
Gong, Edward M. [1 ]
Brendler, Charles B. [1 ]
Zagaja, Gregory P. [1 ]
Shalhav, Arieh L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Dept Surg, Urol Sect, Chicago, IL 60738 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1060
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To report our initial experience of 100 patients with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Continued technological advances have expanded our armamentarium of minimally invasive devices and techniques to offer our patients. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been adopted at many centers. Methods. This was a nonrandomized prospective study evaluating our initial 100 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The follow-up data were obtained prospectively using the validated Rand 36-item health survey, version 2, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 1 2 months postoperatively. Patients who required open conversion were excluded from the outcome analysis. Patients who received a sural nerve graft were excluded from the operative analysis. Results. The average age and body mass index of all patients were 58.4 years (range 42 to 70) and 28.5 kg/m(2) (range 18.1 to 50.6), respectively, with a median follow-up of 12 months. The average prostate-specific antigen level was 6.07 ng/mL. Seven patients required conversion to an open technique, and four underwent sural nerve grafting. The positive surgical margin rate was 16% (15 of 92). Using the Rand 36-item health survey, version 2, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index health surveys, the average percentage of return to baseline urinary function was 52%, 70%, 79%, and 84% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The overall average percentage of return to baseline sexual function was 51%, 58%, 66%, and 80% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe and efficient method for achieving prostate cancer control even during the initial learning curve for this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1279
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Skarecky, D ;
Lee, D ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1738-1741
[2]   Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Eichel, L ;
Edwards, R ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (04) :740-744
[3]   Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation [J].
Chien, GW ;
Mikhail, AA ;
Orvieto, MA ;
Zagaja, GP ;
Sokoloff, MH ;
Brendler, CB ;
Shalhav, AL .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (02) :419-423
[4]   Robotics in urology [J].
Hemal, AK ;
Menon, M .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) :89-93
[5]   Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: Results from CaPSURE [J].
Hu, JC ;
Elkin, EP ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Kattan, MW ;
Carroll, PR ;
Litwin, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) :703-707
[6]   Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Link, RE ;
Su, LM ;
Sullivan, W ;
Bhayani, SB ;
Pavlovich, CP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (01) :175-179
[7]   The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index - Development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure [J].
Litwin, MS ;
Hays, RD ;
Fink, A ;
Ganz, PA ;
Leake, B ;
Brook, RH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (07) :1002-1012
[8]   Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 100 cases [J].
Menon, M ;
Tewari, A ;
Peabody, JO ;
Shrivastava, A ;
Kaul, S ;
Bhandari, A ;
Hemal, AK .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 31 (04) :701-+
[9]   Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: An interim analysis of results and technical points [J].
Menon, M ;
Tewari, A .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (04) :15-20
[10]   Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute experience [J].
Menon, M ;
Tewari, A ;
Baize, B ;
Guillonneau, B ;
Vallancien, G .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) :864-868