The reliability of measuring the density of the L1 vertebral body on CT imaging as a predictor of bone mineral density

被引:38
作者
Gerety, E. -L. [1 ]
Hopper, M. A. [1 ]
Bearcroft, P. W. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, Box 219,Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
关键词
X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; HOUNSFIELD UNITS; LUMBAR SPINE; OSTEOPOROSIS; FRACTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
AIM: To determine whether the density of the L1 vertebra measured on computed tomography (CT) images correlates with the bone mineral density (BMD) as measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and to determine the reliability of L1 density measurements by different observers to see if this measure could help identify patients who would benefit from formal BMD assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-contrast CT along with a phantom for determination of BMD was performed on 30 healthy patients. The L1 density was measured by 3 observers at two time-points separated by at least 2 weeks. RESULTS: L1 density was well correlated to the QCT BMD (correlation coefficient 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.92). There was excellent intra-and interobserver agreement in L1 density measurements. There were excellent intra-class correlation coefficients for each observer's measurements at two separate time points with a coefficient for observer 1 of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97) and for observer 2 and 3 of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1). The interobserver measurements had an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSION: L1 vertebral density can be reliably measured on CT images and might be used as an indicator of BMD for opportunistic screening of patients with osteoporosis. Low bone density detected incidentally on CT imaging could be used to identify patients who should be further investigated and treated for osteoporosis. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177.e9 / 177.e15
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[2]
[Anonymous], 2003, WHO TECH REP SER, V921
[3]
[Anonymous], 2008, ASSESSMENT OSTEOPORO
[4]
Anti-Osteoporotic Therapy After Fragility Fracture Lowers Rate of Subsequent Fracture Analysis of a Large Population Sample [J].
Bawa, Harpreet S. ;
Weick, Jack ;
Dirschl, Douglas R. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (19) :1555-1562
[5]
Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study [J].
Buckens, Constantinus F. ;
Dijkhuis, Gawein ;
de Keizer, Bart ;
Verhaar, Harald J. ;
de Jong, Pim A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (07) :2074-2079
[6]
Scanner and kVp dependence of measured CT numbers in the ACR CT phantom [J].
Cropp, Robert J. ;
Seslija, Petar ;
Tso, David ;
Thakur, Yogesh .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (06) :338-349
[7]
QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA [J].
Dall'Ara, E. ;
Pahr, D. ;
Varga, P. ;
Kainberger, F. ;
Zysset, P. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 (02) :563-572
[8]
Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Today's Clinical Practice [J].
Dasher, Lance G. ;
Newton, Christopher D. ;
Lenchik, Leon .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 48 (03) :541-+
[9]
Osteoporosis in acute fractures of the cervical spine: the role of opportunistic CT screening [J].
Emohare, Osa ;
Dittmer, Alison ;
Morgan, Robert A. ;
Switzer, Julie A. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 23 (01) :1-7
[10]
The Use of Computed Tomography Attenuation to Evaluate Osteoporosis Following Acute Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebra [J].
Emohare, Osa ;
Cagan, Amanda ;
Morgan, Robert ;
Davis, Rick ;
Asis, Martin ;
Switzer, Julie ;
Polly, David W., Jr. .
GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2014, 5 (02) :50-55