Ethical implications of the use of whole genome methods in medical research

被引:63
作者
Kaye, Jane [1 ]
Boddington, Paula [1 ]
de Vries, Jantina [1 ]
Hawkins, Naomi [1 ]
Melham, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Publ Hlth, Ethox Ctr, DPHPC, Oxford OX3 7LF, Oxon, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; GENETIC RESEARCH; SOCIETY; SCIENCE; IDENTIFIABILITY; INFORMATION; CONSENT; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1038/ejhg.2009.191
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The use of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in medical research and the increased ability to share data give a new twist to some of the perennial ethical issues associated with genomic research. GWAS create particular challenges because they produce fine, detailed, genotype information at high resolution, and the results of more focused studies can potentially be used to determine genetic variation for a wide range of conditions and traits. The information from a GWA scan is derived from DNA that is a powerful personal identifier, and can provide information not just on the individual, but also on the individual's relatives, related groups, and populations. Furthermore, it creates large amounts of individual-specific digital information that is easy to share across international borders. This paper provides an overview of some of the key ethical issues around GWAS: consent, feedback of results, privacy, and the governance of research. Many of the questions that lie ahead of us in terms of the next generation sequencing methods will have been foreshadowed by GWAS and the debates around ethical and policy issues that these have created. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, 398-403; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.191; published online 4 November 2009
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 403
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NATURE, DOI DOI 10.1038/461168A
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, King's Law Journal
[3]  
Caulfield T., 2009, Medical Law International, V10, P85, DOI DOI 10.1177/096853320901000201
[4]   Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: Consensus statement [J].
Caulfield, Timothy ;
McGuire, Amy L. ;
Cho, Mildred ;
Buchanan, Janet A. ;
Burgess, Michael M. ;
Danilczyk, Ursula ;
Diaz, Christina M. ;
Fryer-Edwards, Kelly ;
Green, Shane K. ;
Hodosh, Marc A. ;
Juengst, Eric T. ;
Kaye, Jane ;
Kedes, Laurence ;
Knoppers, Bartha Maria ;
Lemmens, Trudo ;
Meslin, Eric M. ;
Murphy, Juli ;
Nussbaum, Robert L. ;
Otlowski, Margaret ;
Pullman, Daryl ;
Ray, Peter N. ;
Sugarman, Jeremy ;
Timmons, Michael .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (03) :430-435
[5]   Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics [J].
Cho, Mildred K. .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2008, 36 (02) :280-+
[6]   Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA [J].
Clayton, Ellen Wright .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2008, 36 (02) :286-+
[7]   Inferential Genotyping of Y Chromosomes in Latter-Day Saints Founders and Comparison to Utah Samples in the HapMap Project [J].
Gitschier, Jane .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2009, 84 (02) :251-258
[8]   The Complexities of Ethical Evaluation of Genomics Research [J].
Hoedemaekers, R. ;
Gordijn, B. ;
Hekster, Y. ;
van Agt, F. .
HEC FORUM, 2006, 18 (01) :18-36
[9]   Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping Microarrays [J].
Homer, Nils ;
Szelinger, Szabolcs ;
Redman, Margot ;
Duggan, David ;
Tembe, Waibhav ;
Muehling, Jill ;
Pearson, John V. ;
Stephan, Dietrich A. ;
Nelson, Stanley F. ;
Craig, David W. .
PLOS GENETICS, 2008, 4 (08)
[10]   Patients' Views on Identifiability of Samples and Informed Consent for Genetic Research [J].
Hull, Sara Chandros ;
Sharp, Richard R. ;
Botkin, Jeffrey R. ;
Brown, Mark ;
Hughes, Mark ;
Sugarman, Jeremy ;
Schwinn, Debra ;
Sankar, Pamela ;
Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana ;
Clarridge, Brian R. ;
Wilfond, Benjamin S. ;
Katz, Treuman .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2008, 8 (10) :62-70