Applications of simulator computed tomography number for photon dose calculations during radiotherapy treatment planning

被引:42
作者
Chu, JCH
Ni, B
Kriz, R
Saxena, VA
机构
[1] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Illinois Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
simulator; computed tomography; computed tomography number; treatment planning; dose calculation;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00159-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: To study the variation of computed tomography (CT) number from a simulator-based scanner and the effect of this variation on photon-dose calculations. Method and materials: CT images of a cylindrical phantom with multiple inserts were obtained using a commercially-available simulator-CT (Ximatron: Varian, Pale Alto, CA). The linear correlation coefficient and Chi-square methods were used to determine the X-ray effective energy in a phantom. CT numbers in Hounsfield units (HU) were measured as a function of phantom size, orientation, field of view (FOV), distance from the center, and time for various inserts. The change of dose calculations due to the CT number variations was then determined using the equivalent path-length (EPL) and collapsed cone convolution methods. Results and discussion: A significant beam-hardening effect was observed for the simulator-CT. Consequently, the CT number from the sim-CT was more sensitive to the size of the phantom than those from a conventional CT. The sim-CT number is not sensitive to the locations within the phantom and is stable over a 6-week period. It is important to use the proper FOV for sim-CT studies; scanning a small polystyrene phantom using a large FOV may result in an increase of 120 HU in CT number at the center of the field. However, the dose-calculation variations, due to the CT number uncertainty, do not exceed 2-3% for 6-18 MV photon beams. Conclusion: The simulator CT images were acquired with patients in the treatment position, and these Crf numbers are useful for CT-based dose calculations. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]
Kriz R. J., 1985, Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, V555, P195, DOI 10.1117/12.949494
[12]
THE UNRELIABILITY OF CT-NUMBERS AS ABSOLUTE VALUES [J].
LEVI, C ;
GRAY, JE ;
MCCULLOUGH, EC ;
HATTERY, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (03) :443-447
[13]
MALLIK R, 1993, CT SIMULATION FOR RADIOTHERAPY, P87
[14]
CT-NUMBER VARIABILITY IN THORACIC GEOMETRY [J].
MCCULLOUGH, EC ;
MORIN, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1983, 141 (01) :135-140
[15]
MILLNER M R, 1978, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V5, P543, DOI 10.1118/1.594488
[16]
Limitations of clinical CT in assessing cortical thickness and density [J].
Newman, DL ;
Dougherty, G ;
Al Obaid, A ;
Al Hajrasy, H .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (03) :619-626
[17]
Purdy, 1992, Semin Radiat Oncol, V2, P235, DOI 10.1016/1053-4296(92)90021-C
[18]
CT-BASED SIMULATION WITH LASER PATIENT MARKING [J].
RAGAN, DP ;
HE, TM ;
MESINA, CF ;
RATANATHARATHORN, V .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (02) :379-380
[19]
CALIBRATION AND RESPONSE OF AN EMI SCANNER [J].
RUTHERFORD, RA ;
PULLAN, BR ;
ISHERWOOD, I .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1976, 11 (01) :7-13
[20]
THE PORTABLE VIRTUAL SIMULATOR [J].
SHEROUSE, GW ;
CHANEY, EL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (02) :475-482