Effects of Hydrology and Field Management on Phosphorus Transport in Surface Runoff

被引:82
作者
Buda, Anthony R. [1 ]
Kleinman, Peter J. A. [1 ]
Srinivasan, M. S. [3 ]
Bryant, Ray B. [1 ]
Feyereisen, Gary W. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] USDA ARS, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
2 AGRICULTURAL HILLSLOPES; WATER-QUALITY; RAINFALL INTENSITY; NUTRIENT LOSSES; CROP CANOPY; GENERATION; MANURE; FERTILIZER; FLOW;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2008.0501
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Phosphorus (P) losses from agricultural landscapes arise from the interaction of hydrologic, edaphic, and management factors, complicated by their spatial and temporal variability. We monitored sites along two agricultural hillslopes to assess the effects of field management and hydrology on P transfers in surface runoff at different landscape positions. Surface runoff varied by landscape position with saturation excess runoff accounting for 19 times the volume of infiltration excess runoff at the north footslope position , but infiltration excess runoff dominated at upslope landscape positions. Runoff differed significantly between south and north footslopes, coinciding with the extent of upslope soil underlain by a fragipan. Phosphorus in runoff was predominantly in dissolved reactive form (70%), with the highest concentrations associated upper landscape positions closest to fields serving as major sources of P. However, the largest loads of P were from the north footslope, where runoff volumes were 24 times larger than from all other sites combined. Loads of P from the north footslope appeared to be primarily chronic transfers of desorbed soil P. Although runoff from the footslope likely contributed directly with stream flow. Findings of this study will be useful for evaluating the critical source area concept, and metrics such as the P-Index.
引用
收藏
页码:2273 / 2284
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ARON G, 1987, WATER RESOUR BULL, V23, P479
[2]  
Bremner J.M., 1965, Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Agronomy 9:1149-1178, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.2.C32
[3]   Factors influencing surface runoff generation from two agricultural hillslopes in central Pennsylvania [J].
Buda, Anthony R. ;
Kleinman, Peter J. A. ;
Srinivasan, M. S. ;
Bryant, Ray B. ;
Feyereisen, Gary W. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2009, 23 (09) :1295-1312
[4]  
Carpenter SR, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, P559, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
CONACHER AJ, 1977, GEODERMA, V18, P1
[7]   Phosphorus transfer in surface runoff from intensive pasture systems at various scales: A review [J].
Dougherty, WJ ;
Fleming, NK ;
Cox, JW ;
Chittleborough, DJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2004, 33 (06) :1973-1988
[8]   AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF RUNOFF PRODUCTION IN PERMEABLE SOILS [J].
DUNNE, T ;
BLACK, RD .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1970, 6 (02) :478-&
[9]   Fragipan controls on runoff generation: Hydropedological implications at landscape and watershed scales [J].
Gburek, WJ ;
Needelman, BA ;
Srinivasan, MS .
GEODERMA, 2006, 131 (3-4) :330-344
[10]  
GBUREK WJ, 1996, ADV HILLSLOPE PROCES, V1, P262