Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) processing of PMMA surface: Optimization of operational parameters

被引:34
作者
Liu, Chaozong
Brown, Norman M. D.
Meenan, Brian J.
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Mat, Oxford OX1 3PH, England
[2] Univ Ulster, No Ireland Bioengn Ctr, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, North Ireland
关键词
surface modification; dielectric barrier discharge; atmospheric plasma processing; poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA); statistical analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.04.001
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 [材料科学与工程]; 080502 [材料学];
摘要
This paper reported the effects that the key dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) operating parameters, discharge power, processing speed, processing duration and electrode configurations, have on producing wettability changes and on uniformity in the PMMA surface region. The results obtained indicate that DBD plasma processing is an effective method for the controlled surface modification of PMMA. Relatively short exposures to the atmospheric pressure discharge produces significant wettability changes at the PMMA surface, as indicted by pronounced reductions in the water contact angle measured. It was observed that the wettability of the resultant surface shows no significant differences in respect to sites in orientation parallel (L-direction) or perpendicular (T-direction) to the electrode long axis. However, the resultant surface shown higher standard deviation (S.D.) of contact angle in T-direction than that in L-direction. Analysis of the role of each of the operating parameters concerned shows that they have a selective effectiveness with respect to resultant surface modification in terms of uniformity of modification and wettability. The number of treatment cycles and the discharge power used were found to have the most significant effects on the homogeneity of the resultant PMMA surface changes in L- and T-orientation, respectively. The number of treatment cycles was found to be the dominant factor (at significance level of 0.05) in respect of water contact angle changes at the processed PMMA surface in both orientations. The driven metal electrodes (stainless steel or aluminium) were apparently superior to the driven dielectric electrode (ceramic or quartz) configurations. The grounded electrode in each case was a silicone rubber-covered aluminium plate. The nature and scale of the surface changes that originate from the various processing conditions employed have been considered so as to determine the optimum treatment conditions in respect of processing outcomes, properties and any orientation dependence. It was revealed that higher processing speeds and longer processing durations are key for uniformity along the electrode axial orientation within the test range employed, while lower processing speeds and short exposure durations are key considerations, in the corresponding perpendicular orientation. In general, longer processing durations (low processing speeds and a high number of treatment cycles) and higher plasma powers induced greater changes in the surface wettability of the PMMA, as demonstrated by the observed water contact angles. This behaviour is taken to indicate that different combinations of DBD operating parameters and electrodes produce discharge conditions that can result in different plasma chemical processes in respect of uniformity, treatment efficiency and orientation dependence. The comparison of the processing outcomes between PMMA and PET revealed that the operating parameters have the similar selective effectiveness on both polymers, indicating the obtained results may be used as a general guidance in controllable surface processing by DBD technique. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2341 / 2350
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Poly(vinyl chloride) surface modification using tetrafluoroethylene in atmospheric pressure glow discharge [J].
Babukutty, Y ;
Prat, R ;
Endo, K ;
Kogoma, M ;
Okazaki, S ;
Kodama, M .
LANGMUIR, 1999, 15 (20) :7055-7062
[2]
Rf magnetron sputtering of polytetrafluoroethylene under various conditions [J].
Biederman, H ;
Zeuner, M ;
Zalman, J ;
Bílková, P ;
Slavínská, D ;
Stelmasuk, V ;
Boldyreva, A .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 2001, 392 (02) :208-213
[3]
Gas discharge plasmas and their applications [J].
Bogaerts, A ;
Neyts, E ;
Gijbels, R ;
van der Mullen, J .
SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2002, 57 (04) :609-658
[4]
Electron energy distribution functions for modelling the plasma kinetics in dielectric barrier discharges [J].
Carman, RJ ;
Mildren, RP .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2000, 33 (19) :L99-L103
[5]
Analysis of two-dimensional microdischarge distribution in dielectric-barrier discharges [J].
Chirokov, A ;
Gutsol, A ;
Fridman, A ;
Sieber, KD ;
Grace, JM ;
Robinson, KS .
PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 13 (04) :623-635
[6]
Study of the surface modification of a nylon-6,6 film processed in an atmospheric pressure air dielectric barrier discharge [J].
Cui, NY ;
Upadhyay, DJ ;
Anderson, CA ;
Brown, NMD .
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 192 (01) :94-100
[7]
DHAINAUT M, 2004, U PARIS SUD CNRS, P1
[8]
Diamond W.J., 2001, PRACTICAL EXPT DESIG
[9]
Hexagon and stripe patterns in dielectric barrier streamer discharge [J].
Dong, LF ;
He, YF ;
Yin, ZQ ;
Chai, ZF .
PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 13 (01) :164-165
[10]
The development of dielectric barrier discharges in gas gaps and on surfaces [J].
Gibalov, VI ;
Pietsch, GJ .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2000, 33 (20) :2618-2636