Fuzzy approaches to quality function deployment for new product design

被引:73
作者
Chen, Liang-Hsuan [1 ]
Ko, Wen-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Ind & Informat Management, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
关键词
Design; Fuzzy mathematical programming; Quality function deployment (QFD); Kano's concept; Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA); INTEGRATING KANOS MODEL; FAILURE MODE; QFD; REQUIREMENTS; FMEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.fss.2008.12.003
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
For new product development, quality function deployment (QFD) is a useful approach to maximize customer satisfaction. The determination of the fulfillment levels of design requirements (DRs) and parts characteristics (PCs) in phases 1 and 2 is an important issue during QFD processes for new product design. Unlike the existing literature, which mainly focuses on the DRs, this paper proposes fuzzy nonlinear programming models based on Kano's concept to determine the fulfillment levels of PCs with the aim of achieving the determined contribution levels of DRs in phase I for customer satisfaction. In addition, to deal with the design risk, this study incorporates failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) into QFD processes, and treats it as the constraint factor in the models. To cope with the vague nature of product development processes, fuzzy approaches are used for both FMEA and QFD. The applicability of the proposed models in practice is demonstrated with a numerical example. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2620 / 2639
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]  
Cher Ming Tan, 2003, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V20, P378, DOI 10.1108/02656710310468560
[12]  
Cohen L., 1995, QUALITY FUNCTION DEP
[13]   Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD) [J].
Cristiano, JJ ;
Liker, JK ;
White, CC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, 48 (01) :81-95
[14]  
Ginn D.M., 1998, European Journal of Innovation Management, P7, DOI [10.1108/14601069810198448, DOI 10.1108/14601069810198448]
[15]  
Guimaraes ACF, 2004, PROG NUCL ENERG, V44, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.pnucene.2003.12.001
[16]  
Han S.B., 2001, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V18, P796, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656710110401187
[17]  
HAUSER JR, 1988, HARVARD BUS REV, V66, P63
[18]  
Kano N., 1984, Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, V41, P39, DOI [10.20684/quality.14.2_147, DOI 10.20684/QUALITY.14.2_147, 10.20684/quality.14.2147, DOI 10.20684/QUALITY.14.2147]
[19]   Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment [J].
Karsak, EE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (18) :3957-3974
[20]  
Kaufmann A., 1988, Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science