Tympanic temperature measurements: Are they reliable in the critically ill? A clinical study of measures of agreement

被引:105
作者
Moran, John L. [1 ]
Peter, John Victor
Solomon, Patricia J.
Grealy, Bernadette
Smith, Tania
Ashforth, Wendy
Wake, Megan
Peake, Sandra L.
Peisach, Aaron R.
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Math Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
critically ill; core temperature; ear-based thermometry; concordance; linear mixed model; intraclass correlation coefficient;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000250318.31453.CB
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective., Accurate measurement of temperature is vital in the intensive care setting. A prospective trial was performed to compare the accuracy of tympanic, urinary, and axillary temperatures with that of pulmonary artery (PA) core temperature measurements. Design. A total of 110 patients were enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study. Setting. Multidisciplinary intensive care unit of a university teaching hospital. Patients: The cohort was (mean +/- SD) 65 +/- 16 yrs of age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 25 +/- 9, 58% of the patients were men, and 76% were mechanically ventilated. The accuracy of tympanic (averaged over both ears), axillary (averaged over both sides), and urinary temperatures was referenced (as mean difference, A degrees centigrade) to PA temperatures as standard in 6,703 recordings. Lin concordance correlation (p(c)) and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (degrees centigrade) described the relationship between paired measurements. Regression analysis (linear mixed model) assessed covariate confounding with respect to temperature modes and reliability formulated as an intraclass correlation coefficient. Measurements and Main Results. Concordance of PA temperatures with tympanic, urinary, and axillary was 0.77, 0.92, and 0.83, respectively. Compared with PA temperatures, Delta (limits of agreement) were 0.36 degrees C (-0.56 degrees C, 1.28 degrees C), -0.05 degrees C (-0.69 degrees C, 0.59 degrees C), and 0.30 degrees C (-0.42 degrees C, 1.01 degrees C) for tympanic, urinary, and axillary temperatures, respectively. Temperature measurement mode effect, estimated via regression analysis, was consistent with concordance and Delta (PA vs. urinary, p =.98). Patient age (p =.03), sedation score (p =.0001), and dialysis (p =.0001) had modest negative relations with temperature; quadratic relationships were identified with adrenaline and dobutamine. No interactions with particular temperature modes were identified (p >=.12 for all comparisons) and no relationship was identified with either mean arterial pressure or APACHE II score (p >=.64). The average temperature mode intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.72. Conclusion. Agreement of tympanic with pulmonary temperature was inferior to that of urinary temperature, which, on overall assessment, seemed more likely to reflect PA core temperature.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 164
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Accuracy of an infrared tympanic thermometer [J].
Amoateng-Adjepong, Y ;
Del Mundo, J ;
Manthous, CA .
CHEST, 1999, 115 (04) :1002-1005
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, STAT EVALUATION MEAS
[3]   Reliability and accuracy of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring [J].
Arts, DGT ;
de Keizer, NF ;
Vroom, MB ;
de Jonge, E .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (09) :1988-1993
[4]   MEASURES OF AGREEMENT - A SINGLE PROCEDURE [J].
BARTKO, JJ .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (5-7) :737-745
[5]  
Belsley DA., 1991, Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression
[6]   Induced hypothermia in critical care medicine: A review [J].
Bernard, SA ;
Buist, M .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (07) :2041-2051
[7]   AN OMNIBUS TEST FOR COMPARING 2 MEASURING DEVICES [J].
BLACKWOOD, LG ;
BRADLEY, EL .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 23 (01) :12-16
[8]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[9]   A NOTE ON THE USE OF THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT IN THE EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN 2 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1990, 20 (05) :337-340
[10]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310