Surface tension, interfacial tension, and morphology in blends of thermoplastic polyurethanes and polyolefins.: Part I.: Surface tension of melts of TPU model substances and polyolefins

被引:717
作者
Pötschke, P
Pionteck, E
Stutz, H
机构
[1] Inst Polymerforsch Dresdev EV, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
[2] BASF AG, Polymer Res Div, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
关键词
surface tension; pendant drop analysis; thermoplastic polyurethane;
D O I
10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00612-2
中图分类号
O63 [高分子化学(高聚物)];
学科分类号
070305 ; 080501 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The pendant drop analysis was used to determine surface tensions gamma of polymer melts. For thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) elastomers, which are block copolymers of crystallisable hard segments (HS) and amorphous soft segments (SS), the surface tensions of the different segments in the melt were measured for the first time. As model compounds for the SS polyetherdiols (PEt-diols) and a polyesterdiol (PEs-diol) were used. To suppress the influence of the hydroxyl end groups on the surface properties the diols were either acetylated or chain extended with a diisocyanate. The influence of the molecular weight and the endcapping method was investigated. All TPU segments exhibit higher surface tensions than that measured for polyolefins due to their polar character except the acetylated PEt-diols with gamma-values between those of polypropylene and polyethylene. With 48-45 mN/m at 120-165 degreesC, the highest surface tension was determined for an amorphous HS model. The surface tensions of both PEs-diols are higher than that of the PEt-diol model compounds. While the surface tensions of the acetylated and MDI extended PEs-diols exhibit the same temperature dependence, differences were found between the surface tension of the acetylated and MDI extended PEt-diols, which diminish with increasing molecular weight of the model substances. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6965 / 6972
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Influence of processing conditions on the multiphase structure of segmented polyurethane [J].
Pompe, G ;
Pohlers, A ;
Potschke, P ;
Pionteck, J .
POLYMER, 1998, 39 (21) :5147-5153
[12]  
Potschke P, 1997, J APPL POLYM SCI, V64, P749, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970425)64:4<749::AID-APP14>3.0.CO
[13]  
2-P
[14]   PRESSURE VOLUME TEMPERATURE RELATIONSHIPS FOR POLYMERIC LIQUIDS - A REVIEW OF EQUATIONS OF STATE AND THEIR CHARACTERISTIC PARAMETERS FOR 56 POLYMERS [J].
RODGERS, PA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1993, 48 (06) :1061-1080
[15]   SURFACE TENSION OF POLYMER LIQUIDS [J].
ROE, RJ .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1968, 72 (06) :2013-&
[16]  
SCHMITT BJ, 1979, ANGEW CHEM, V91, P286
[17]   Determination of interfacial tension from the profile of a pendant drop using computer-aided image processing .1. Theoretical [J].
Song, BH ;
Springer, J .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1996, 184 (01) :64-76
[18]   DROP BREAKUP AND COALESCENCE IN POLYMER BLENDS - THE EFFECTS OF CONCENTRATION AND COMPATIBILIZATION [J].
SUNDARARAJ, U ;
MACOSKO, CW .
MACROMOLECULES, 1995, 28 (08) :2647-2657
[20]  
Tomotika S, 1935, P ROY SOC LOND A MAT, V150, P322, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSPA.1935.0104