Emergy evaluation of grazing cattle in Argentina's Pampas

被引:49
作者
Rotolo, G. C.
Rydberg, T.
Lieblein, G.
Francis, C.
机构
[1] Natl Inst Agr Technol, Agr Expt Stn, RA-2206 Oliveros, Argentina
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
[4] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
beef production; pastures; ruminant management; system evaluation; production efficiency;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2006.08.011
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Argentina has a tradition of grazing livestock and the Pampas region produces 61% of the total beef cattle, with more than 80% allocated to internal consumption. Potential for expanding exports has created incentives for increasing production, yet national decisions should include an assessment of natural resources and environmental impacts of the grazing system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complete system of grazing cattle in Argentina's Pampas in an environmental and economic context. Emergy analysis is used to assess the potential for long-term, sustainable cattle production including indicators of performance and environmental sustainability, with focus on all sources of input energy and the energy value of outputs. Rainfall contributes 61% of the total emergy to the grazing system. Natural pasture depends most highly on local renewable resources (85%) and less than 4% on purchased inputs. In contrast, sowed pasture and maize are 41 and 35% dependent on purchased inputs. Results showed the grazing system to be environmentally sustainable with a low impact on the environment. Yet specific subsystems where grazing cattle depend for part of the cycle on improved sowed pasture or on maize have a relatively high dependency on external inputs and moderate use of local non-renewable resources. Natural pastures have the highest environmental sustainability and the lowest load on the environment, due to low losses of soil organic matter. Appropriate management strategies are available for grazing livestock systems, yet government regulations need to provide incentives to ensure future production stability and economic returns while minimizing adverse effects on the environment. One method to achieve this is recognizing and rewarding farmers for the emergy contributions of the environment. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 395
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]   A picture is worth a thousand words: energy systems language and simulation [J].
Brown, MT .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 178 (1-2) :83-100
[12]   Eulogy [J].
Brown, MT ;
Hall, CAS ;
Jorgensen, SE .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 178 (1-2) :1-10
[13]   Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options [J].
Brown, MT ;
Buranakarn, V .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2003, 38 (01) :1-22
[14]   Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation [J].
Brown, MT ;
Ulgiati, S .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 9 (1-2) :51-69
[15]   Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: A comparative view [J].
Brown, MT ;
Herendeen, RA .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 19 (03) :219-235
[16]   Using energy systems theory to define, measure, and interpret ecological integrity and ecosystem health [J].
Campbell, DE .
ECOSYSTEM HEALTH, 2000, 6 (03) :181-204
[17]  
CARILLO J, 1997, MANEJO RODEO CRIA, P507
[18]  
CASTANO J, 2003, 1 JORN ACT GAN INTA, P2
[19]  
Cocimano M, 1975, PRODUCCION ANIMAL, V4, P161
[20]  
DERGIBUS VA, 1988, REV ASOC MENDOCINA P, V1, P3