Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results

被引:40
作者
Baum, F [1 ]
Fischer, U [1 ]
Obenauer, S [1 ]
Grabbe, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Radiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
computer-aided diagnosis; direct digital full-field mammography; microcalcifications; BI-RADS classification;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-002-1393-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For the first time, fullfield digital mammography (FFDM) allows computer-aided detection (CAD) analysis of directly acquired digital image data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CAD system in patients with histologically correlated breast cancer depicted with FFDM. Sixty-three cases of histologically proven breast cancer detected with FFDM (Senographe 2000D, GE Medical Systems, Buc, France) were analyzed using a CAD system (Image Checker V2.3, R2 Technology, Los Altos, Calif.). Fourteen of these malignancies were characterized as microcalcifications, 37 as masses, and 12 as both. The mammographic findings were categorized as BI-RADS 3 (n=5), BI-RADS 4 (n=17) and BI-RADS 5 (n=40). The sensitivity for malignant lesions and the rate of false-positive marks per image were calculated. The sensitivity and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. The sensitivity of the CAD R2 system in breast cancer seen on FFDM was 89% for microcalcifications [CI95%=(70%; 98%)] and 81% for masses [CI95%=(67%; 91%)]. As expected, the detection rate was higher in lesions categorized as BI-RADS 5 (37 of 40) compared with lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4 (11 of 17). In the group categorized as BI-RADS 3 the detection rate was 4 of 5 lesions; however, this group was very small. The rate of false-positive marks was 0.35 microcalcification marks/image and 0.26 mass marks/image. The overall rate of false-positive marks was 0.61 per image. CAD based on FFDM provides an optimized work flow. Results are equivalent to the results reported for CAD analysis of secondarily digitized image data. Sensitivity for microcalcifications is acceptable and for masses is low. The number of false-positive marks per image should be reduced.
引用
收藏
页码:3015 / 3017
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Full-field digital mammography [J].
Bick, U .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (12) :957-964
[2]  
Burhenne LJW, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P554
[3]   Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls [J].
Doi, K ;
MacMahon, H ;
Katsuragawa, S ;
Nishikawa, RM ;
Jiang, YL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 31 (02) :97-109
[4]  
FISCHER U, 2000, ROFO FORTSCHR RONTG, V172, P41
[5]   Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center [J].
Freer, TW ;
Ulissey, MJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) :781-786
[6]   Evaluation of computer-assisted diagnosis system for carcinoma of the breast. [J].
Funovics, M ;
Schamp, S ;
Helbich, TH ;
Lackner, B ;
Wunderbaldinger, P ;
Fuchsjäger, M ;
Lechner, G ;
Wolf, G .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2001, 173 (03) :218-223
[7]   Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system [J].
Muller, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 31 (01) :25-34
[8]   CAN COMPUTERS HELP RADIOLOGISTS READ MAMMOGRAMS [J].
VYBORNY, CJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (02) :315-317