Slope position and erosional effects on soil properties and corn production on a Miamian soil in central Ohio

被引:50
作者
Changere, A [1 ]
Lal, R [1 ]
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV, SCH NAT RESOURCES, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE | 1997年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1300/J064v11n01_03
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Corn (Zea mays L.) growth and yield were related to surface soil properties and slope position on field runoff plots established on a Miamian (Typic Hapludalf) soil with 5 to 6% slope in central Ohio. The 3-year study conducted from 1988 through 1991 involved four treatments designed to create different magnitude of soil erosion: (1) disk-plowing up and down the slope (DP), (2) disk-plowing up and down the slope followed by protective netting suspended about 0.15 m above the soil surface (PN), (3) uncultivated bare fallow without any vegetation cover followed by removal of topsoil to 0.2 m depth (R), and (4) uncultivated fallow with natural vegetation cover followed by plowing (F). These treatments were imposed during 1988 and 1989 on runoff plots of 1.8 X 15 m, and all treatments were replicated three times. Surface soil of the R treatment was removed to 0.2 m depth in May 1990. From there on, all plots were plowed and planted to corn. Measurements of soil properties and corn growth were made at 3 slope positions in each plot, corresponding with upper, middle and lower slopes. Soil erosion was the most severe, clay content the highest, and aggregation the least in the middle slope position. Corn growth was significantly affected by slope position, and mean corn height 10 weeks after planting was 13.5% more in the lower compared with other two positions. The highest biomass production, greater nutrient uptake, and highest corn grain yield were observed in the lower slope position. During 1990 with normal rains, mean corn grain yield in the lower position was 36.9% and 56.8% more than upper and middle landscape positions, respectively. During 1991 with below normal rains, mean grain yield in the lower position was 3.14 and 3.70 times more than that of the upper and middle positions, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 21
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   EFFECTS OF SOIL-EROSION ON CROP PRODUCTIVITY [J].
LAL, R .
CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 1987, 5 (04) :303-367
[22]   SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OF A MOLLISOL AND CORN (ZEA-MAYS-L) GROWTH 20 YEARS AFTER TOPSOIL REMOVAL [J].
LINDSTROM, MJ ;
SCHUMACHER, TE ;
LEMME, GD ;
GOLLANY, HM .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1986, 7 (1-2) :51-62
[23]   SOIL-LANDSCAPE RELATIONSHIPS IN A CLOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM [J].
MALO, DD ;
WORCESTER, BK ;
CASSEL, DK ;
MATZDORF, KD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1974, 38 (05) :813-818
[24]   INSITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AT 4 HILLSLOPE LOCATIONS IN A CLOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM [J].
MATZDORF, KD ;
CASSEL, DK ;
WORCESTER, BK ;
MALO, DD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1975, 39 (03) :508-512
[25]   SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF WHEAT YIELD AND SOIL PROPERTIES ON COMPLEX HILLS [J].
MILLER, MP ;
SINGER, MJ ;
NIELSEN, DR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (04) :1133-1141
[26]  
OLSON KR, 1994, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V49, P591
[27]  
OLSON KR, 1994, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V49, P586
[28]   ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC COSTS OF SOIL EROSION AND CONSERVATION BENEFITS [J].
PIMENTEL, D ;
HARVEY, C ;
RESOSUDARMO, P ;
SINCLAIR, K ;
KURZ, D ;
MCNAIR, M ;
CRIST, S ;
SHPRITZ, L ;
FITTON, L ;
SAFFOURI, R ;
BLAIR, R .
SCIENCE, 1995, 267 (5201) :1117-1123
[29]  
RUHE R. V., 1967, Tech. Bull. US Dep. Agric. Soil Conserv. Serv.
[30]  
Ruhe R.V., 1965, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V20, P52