Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and 'ending incongruence': a cautionary tale in phylogenetics

被引:165
作者
Soltis, DE
Albert, VA
Savolainen, V
Hilu, K
Qiu, YL
Chase, MW
Farris, JS
Stefanovic, S
Rice, DW
Palmer, JD
Soltis, PS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Bot, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Genet Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Oslo, Nat Hist Museums, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Bot Garden, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway
[5] Royal Bot Gardens, Jodrell Lab, Mol Systemat Sect, Richmond TW9 3DS, Surrey, England
[6] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Biol, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[8] Nat Hist Riksmuseet, Mol Syst Lab, S-10405 Stockholm, Sweden
[9] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[10] Univ Florida, Florida Museum Nat Hist, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[11] Univ Florida, Genet Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.tplants.2004.08.008
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
As systematists grapple with assembling the Tree of Life, recent studies have encouraged a genomic-scale approach, obtaining DNA sequence data for entire nuclear, plastid or mitochondrial genomes for a few exemplar taxa. Some have proclaimed that this comparative genomic strategy heralds the end of incongruence in phylogeny reconstruction. Although we applaud the use of many genes to resolve phylogenetic patterns, there is a significant caveat. In spite of, or even because of, the abundant data per taxon, whole-genome sequencing for a few exemplars can provide completely resolved and strongly supported, but incorrect, evolutionary reconstructions. We provide a conspicuous example that includes Amborella, the putative sister of all other extant angiosperms, highlighting the limits of phylogenetics when whole genomes are used but taxon sampling is poor.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"?: Not so fast [J].
Soltis, DE ;
Soltis, PS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2004, 91 (06) :997-1001
[42]   Phylogeny of seed plants based on evidence from eight genes [J].
Soltis, DE ;
Soltis, PS ;
Zanis, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2002, 89 (10) :1670-1681
[43]   Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: An empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms [J].
Soltis, DE ;
Soltis, PS ;
Mort, ME ;
Chase, MW ;
Savolainen, V ;
Hoot, SB ;
Morton, CM .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1998, 47 (01) :32-42
[44]   Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology [J].
Soltis, PS ;
Soltis, DE ;
Chase, MW .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6760) :402-404
[45]  
Soltis PS, 2003, STAT SCI, V18, P256
[46]   CONFIDENCE IN EVOLUTIONARY TREES FROM BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE DATA [J].
STEEL, MA ;
LOCKHART, PJ ;
PENNY, D .
NATURE, 1993, 364 (6436) :440-442
[47]  
TEMPLETON AR, 1983, EVOLUTION, V37, P221, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05533.x
[48]   Molecular evolutionary dynamics of cytochrome b in strepsirrhine primates: The phylogenetic significance of third-position transversions [J].
Yoder, AD ;
Vilgalys, R ;
Ruvolo, M .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1996, 13 (10) :1339-1350
[49]   The root of the angiosperms revisited [J].
Zanis, MJ ;
Soltis, DE ;
Soltis, PS ;
Mathews, S ;
Donoghue, MJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (10) :6848-6853
[50]   Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error [J].
Zwickl, DJ ;
Hillis, DM .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2002, 51 (04) :588-598