A mobile-bearing knee prosthesis can reduce strain at the proximal tibia

被引:33
作者
Bottlang, Michael
Erne, Oliver K.
Lacatusu, Elvis
Sommers, Mark B.
Kessler, Oliver
机构
[1] Legacy Res & Technol Ctr, Biomech Lab, Portland, OR 97232 USA
[2] Stryker Europe, Thalwil, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000203463.27937.97
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Mobile and fixed-bearing knee prostheses are likely to generate distinct strain gradients in the proximal tibia. The resulting strain distribution in the proximal tibia governs bone remodeling and affects implant integration and stability. We determined the effects of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses on strain distribution at the proximal tibia. This mobile-bearing prosthesis was evaluated in cadaveric specimens under axial and torsional loading. Strain on the proximal tibial cortex was measured with rosette strain gages and an optical full-field strain acquisition system. Tibial torsion in response to combined axial and torsional loading was documented. There was no difference in cortex strain between the fixed and the mobile-bearing prostheses under 1.5 kN axial loading. Superimposing 10 degrees tibial internal rotation induced 22% less compressive strain in the mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with the fixed-bearing prosthes1s. Under 10 degrees tibial external rotation, the mobile-bearing prosthesis induced 33% less compressive strain than the fixed-bearing prosthesis. Optically acquired strain fields showed peak compressive strain at the anteromedial aspect 30 mm below the joint line. The mobile-bearing prosthesis reduced torque in the proximal tibia during knee rotation by 68-73% compared with the fixed-bearing prosthesis. Our data suggest that the particular mobile-bearing prosthesis tested potentially reduces elevated strain levels in the proximal tibia.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 111
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
BOURNE RB, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P95
[2]
BOURNE RB, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P285
[3]
THE EFFECT OF MEDIAL MENISCECTOMY ON STRAIN DISTRIBUTION IN THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE TIBIA [J].
BOURNE, RB ;
FINLAY, JB ;
PAPADOPOULOS, P ;
ANDREAE, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 66A (09) :1431-1437
[4]
Buechel FF, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P41
[5]
BUECHEL FF, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P162
[6]
The press-fit condylar total knee system - 8-to 10-year results with a posterior cruciate-retaining design [J].
Buehler, KO ;
Venn-Watson, E ;
D'Lima, DD ;
Colwell, CW .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (06) :698-701
[7]
Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement - A nine to twelve-year follow-up study [J].
Callaghan, JJ ;
Squire, MW ;
Goetz, DD ;
Sullivan, PM ;
Johnston, RC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (05) :705-711
[8]
Callaghan JJ, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P221
[9]
D'Lima DD, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P232
[10]
Why are total knee replacements revised? Analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry [J].
Gioe, TJ ;
Killeen, KK ;
Grimm, K ;
Mehle, S ;
Scheltema, K .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (428) :100-106