Not Invented Here? Innovation in company towns

被引:71
作者
Agrawal, Ajay [2 ,3 ]
Cockburn, Iain [4 ,5 ]
Rosell, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt Canada, Dept Finance, Ottawa, ON K1A 0G5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada
[3] NBER, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada
[4] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] NBER, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Knowledge flows; Agglomeration; Recombination; Innovation; Entrepreneurship; R-AND-D; PATENT CITATIONS; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; GEOGRAPHY; CITIES; LOCALIZATION; ORGANIZATION; DIVERSITY; MOBILITY; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jue.2009.10.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine variation in the concentration of inventive activity across 72 of North America's most highly innovative locations. In 12 of these areas, innovation is particularly concentrated in a single, large firm; we refer to such locations as "company towns". We find that inventors employed by large firms in these locations tend to draw disproportionately from their firm's own prior inventions (as measured by citations to their own prior patents) relative to what would be expected given the underlying distribution of innovative activity across all inventing firms in a particular technology field. Furthermore, we find such inventors are more likely to build upon the same prior inventions year after year. However, smaller firms in company towns do not exhibit this myopic behavior: they draw upon prior inventions as broadly as their small-firm counterparts in more diverse locations. In addition, we find that inventions by large firms in company towns have less impact than those produced elsewhere, although the difference is modest, and that the impact is disproportionately appropriated by the inventing firms themselves. Finally, the geographic scope of impact realized by company town inventions is narrower, whether produced by large or small firms. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 89
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Acs Zoltan.J., 2002, INNOVATION GROWTH CI
[2]   The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Cockburn, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2003, 21 (09) :1227-1253
[3]   How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data [J].
Agrawal, Ajay ;
Kapur, Devesh ;
McHale, John .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (02) :258-269
[4]   Gone but not forgotten: knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships [J].
Agrawal, Ajay ;
Cockburn, Iain ;
McHale, John .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 6 (05) :571-591
[5]   DIRECT VALIDATION OF CITATION COUNTS AS INDICATORS OF INDUSTRIALLY IMPORTANT PATENTS [J].
ALBERT, MB ;
AVERY, D ;
NARIN, F ;
MCALLISTER, P .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (03) :251-259
[6]   Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks [J].
Almeida, P ;
Kogut, B .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (07) :905-917
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, J POLIT ECON, V98, P2, DOI DOI 10.1086/261725
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy
[9]  
Arrow K., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609
[10]  
Audretsch DB, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P630