Extracellular Matrix Stiffness and Architecture Govern Intracellular Rheology in Cancer

被引:149
作者
Baker, Erin L. [1 ]
Bonnecaze, Roger T. [2 ,3 ]
Zamao, Muhammad H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Biomed Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Chem Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Inst Theoret Chem, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PARTICLE-TRACKING MICRORHEOLOGY; CELL-MIGRATION; IN-VIVO; GROWTH; MECHANICS; TRACTION; BLOCKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.054
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Little is known about the complex interplay between the extracellular mechanical environment and the mechanical properties that characterize the dynamic intracellular environment. To elucidate this relationship in cancer, we probe the intracellular environment using particle-tracking microrheology. In three-dimensional (3D) matrices, intracellular effective creep compliance of prostate cancer cells is shown to increase with increasing extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, whereas modulating ECM stiffness does not significantly affect the intracellular mechanical state when cells are attached to two-dimensional (2D) matrices. Switching from 2D to 3D matrices induces an order-of-magnitude shift in intracellular effective creep compliance and apparent elastic modulus. However, for a given matrix stiffness, partial blocking of beta 1 integrins mitigates the shift in intracellular mechanical state that is invoked by switching from a 2D to 3D matrix architecture. This finding suggests that the increased cell-matrix engagement inherent to a 3D matrix architecture may contribute to differences observed in viscoelastic properties between cells attached to 2D matrices and cells embedded within 3D matrices. In total, our observations show that ECM stiffness and architecture can strongly influence the intracellular mechanical state of cancer cells.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1021
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MICROSCALE DIAGNOSTI
[2]   Cell migration through small gaps [J].
Brunner, Claudia A. ;
Ehrlicher, Allen ;
Kohlstrunk, Bernd ;
Knebel, Detlef ;
Kaes, Josef A. ;
Goegler, Michael .
EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL WITH BIOPHYSICS LETTERS, 2006, 35 (08) :713-719
[3]   Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension [J].
Cukierman, E ;
Pankov, R ;
Stevens, DR ;
Yamada, KM .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5547) :1708-1712
[4]   Macrorheology and adaptive microrheology of endothelial cells subjected to fluid shear stress [J].
Dangaria, Jhanvi H. ;
Butler, Peter J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 293 (05) :C1568-C1575
[5]   Probing single-cell micromechanics in vivo:: The microrheology of C-elegans developing embryos [J].
Daniels, Brian R. ;
Masi, Byron C. ;
Wirtz, Denis .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 90 (12) :4712-4719
[6]   Enhanced viscoelasticity of human cystic fibrotic sputum correlates with increasing microheterogeneity in particle transport [J].
Dawson, M ;
Wirtz, D ;
Hanes, J .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 278 (50) :50393-50401
[7]   Defining the role of matrix compliance and proteolysis in three-dimensional cell spreading and remodeling [J].
Dikovsky, Daniel ;
Bianco-Peled, Havazelet ;
Seliktar, Dror .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 94 (07) :2914-2925
[8]   Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate [J].
Discher, DE ;
Janmey, P ;
Wang, YL .
SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5751) :1139-1143
[9]   Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses [J].
Engler, A ;
Bacakova, L ;
Newman, C ;
Hategan, A ;
Griffin, M ;
Discher, D .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (01) :617-628
[10]   Neurite branching on deformable substrates [J].
Flanagan, LA ;
Ju, YE ;
Marg, B ;
Osterfield, M ;
Janmey, PA .
NEUROREPORT, 2002, 13 (18) :2411-2415