Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research

被引:914
作者
Hulsheger, Ute R. [1 ]
Anderson, Neil [2 ]
Salgado, Jesus F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Econ & Business, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Social Psychol, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
关键词
innovation; creativity; teams; meta-analysis; review; CLIMATE INVENTORY TCI; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; EXPECTED EVALUATION; INTEGRATIVE MODEL; PSYCHOMETRIC TEST;
D O I
10.1037/a0015978
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article presents a meta-analysis of team-level antecedents of creativity and innovation in the workplace. Using a general input-process-output model, the authors examined 15 team-level variables researched in primary studies published over the last 30 years and their relation to creativity and innovation. An exhaustive search of the international innovation literature resulted in a final sample (k) of 104 independent studies. Results revealed that team process variables of support for innovation, vision, task orientation, and external communication displayed the strongest relationships with creativity and innovation (rho s between 0.4 and 0.5). Input variables (i.e., team composition and structure) showed weaker effect sizes. Moderator analyses confirmed that relationships differ substantially depending on measurement method (self-ratings vs. independent ratings of innovation) and measurement level (individual vs. team innovation). Team variables displayed considerably stronger relationships with self-report measures of innovation compared with independent ratings and objective criteria. Team process variables were more strongly related to creativity and innovation measured at the team than the individual level. Implications for future research and pragmatic ramifications for organizational practice are discussed in conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1145
页数:18
相关论文
共 178 条
[91]  
Kozlowski S.W., 2003, COMPREHENSIVE HDB PS, V12, P333, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI1214, 10.1002/0471264385.wei1214, 10.4324/9781315805986-21]
[92]   Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams [J].
Kozlowski, Steve W. J. ;
Ilgen, Daniel R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, :77-124
[93]  
Kratzer J., 2006, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V15, P96, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2006.00372.X
[94]  
Kratzer J., 2004, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V13, P63, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2004.00294.X
[95]  
Krause DE, 2006, Z PERSONALFORSCH, V20, P102
[96]  
Kurtzberg TR, 2005, INT J CONFL MANAGE, V16, P335, DOI 10.1108/eb022931
[97]   Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams [J].
Kurtzberg, TR .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2005, 17 (01) :51-65
[98]   FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO LARGE-SCALE INSTRUCTIONAL-DEVELOPMENT [J].
LANGER, P ;
DUNCAN, E ;
RASSEN, RL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1980, 47 (01) :147-154
[99]   Predicting voice behavior in work groups [J].
LePine, JA ;
Van Dyne, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (06) :853-868
[100]  
Lott A J, 1965, Psychol Bull, V64, P259, DOI 10.1037/h0022386