Are attempts to have impaired children justifiable?

被引:25
作者
Anstey, KW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Appl Philosophy & Publ Eth, Dept Philosophy, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jme.28.5.286
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In a recent case, artifical insemination was employed by a couple in an attempt to ensure the birth of a deaf child. In response to this, I argue that individuals should not be allowed to select for or against deafness. While I establish that preferences for deaf children can be inherently just, allowing individuals to secure these preferences may have unacceptable consequences for existing persons who are deaf. I show that these follow even granting this couple's contestable understanding of the deaf as a minority group.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 288
页数:3
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Anstey Kyle W, 2002, Monash Bioeth Rev, V21, P10
[2]   Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy [J].
Asch, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (11) :1649-1657
[3]  
BATEMAN GC, 1992, VIEWPOINTS DEAFNESS, P19
[4]   Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps [J].
Bickenbach, JE ;
Chatterji, S ;
Badley, EM ;
Üstün, TB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (09) :1173-1187
[5]  
COLEMAN C, 2001, J BIOETHICS, V1, P27
[6]   Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future [J].
Davis, DS .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1997, 27 (02) :7-15
[7]  
MUNDY L, 2002, WASHINGTON POST 0331, pW22
[8]  
NEWELL C, 2000, INTERACTION, V13, P16
[9]  
OVERALL C, 1987, ETHICS HUMAN REPROD, P25
[10]  
Padden C., 1988, Deaf in America: Voices from a culture