Optimal dynamic inversion-based semi-active control of benchmark bridge using MR dampers

被引:18
作者
Ali, Sk Faruque [1 ]
Ramaswamy, Ananth [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Dept Civil Engn, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
关键词
dynamic inversion; magnetorheological dampers; optimal control; benchmark bridge; semi-active vibration control; SEISMIC RESPONSE; MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS; STRUCTURAL CONTROL; PART I; FRICTION;
D O I
10.1002/stc.325
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A new two-stage state feedback control design approach has been developed to monitor the voltage supplied to magnetorheological (MR) dampers for semi-active vibration control of the benchmark highway bridge. The first stage contains a primary controller, which provides the force required to obtain a desired closed-loop response of the system. In the second stage, an optimal dynamic inversion (ODI) approach has been developed to obtain the amount of voltage to be supplied to each of the MR dampers such that it provides the required force prescribed by the primary controller. ODI is formulated by optimization with dynamic inversion, such that an optimal voltage is supplied to each damper in a set. The proposed control design has been simulated for both phase-I and phase-II study of the recently developed benchmark highway bridge problem. The efficiency of the proposed controller is analyzed in terms of the performance indices defined in the benchmark problem definition. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach generally reduces peak response quantities over those obtained from the sample semi-active controller, although some response quantities have been seen to be increasing. Overall, the proposed control approach is quite competitive as compared with the sample semi-active control approach. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 585
页数:22
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-Part I: Phase I Problem definition [J].
Agrawal, Anil ;
Tan, Ping ;
Nagarajaiah, Satish ;
Zhang, Jian .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2009, 16 (05) :509-529
[2]  
Ali S, 2008, THESIS INDIAN I SCI
[3]  
ALI SF, 2009, J DYNAMIC SYSTEMS ME, V13
[4]  
ALI SF, 2007, P IEEE MULT SYST CON, P573
[5]   GA-optimized FLC-driven semi-active control for phase-II smart nonlinear base-isolated benchmark building [J].
Ali, Sk. Faruque ;
Ramaswamy, Ananth .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2008, 15 (05) :797-820
[6]  
Caicedo J.M., 2003, J STRUCTURAL CONTROL, V10, P137, DOI DOI 10.1002/STC.23
[7]  
Caughey TK, 1998, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V27, P1125, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(1998110)27:11<1125::AID-EQE791>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-S
[9]   Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction [J].
Dyke, SJ ;
Spencer, BF ;
Sain, MK ;
Carlson, JD .
SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1996, 5 (05) :565-575
[10]   Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges [J].
Dyke, SJ ;
Caicedo, JM ;
Turan, G ;
Bergman, LA ;
Hague, S .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2003, 129 (07) :857-872