The tolerance-fecundity trade-off and the maintenance of diversity in seed size

被引:300
作者
Muller-Landau, Helene C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, APO, AA 34002 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
species coexistence; habitat partitioning; competition-colonization tradeoff; stress tolerance; seed mass; RECRUITMENT LIMITATION; HABITAT DESTRUCTION; PERENNIAL PLANTS; SPECIES RICHNESS; COMPETITION; COEXISTENCE; DISPERSAL; COLONIZATION; POPULATIONS; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0911637107
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Seed size commonly varies by five to six orders of magnitude among coexisting plant species, a pattern ecologists have long sought to explain. Because seed size trades off with seed number, small-seeded species clearly have the advantage in fecundity, but what is the countervailing advantage of large seeds? Higher competitive ability combined with strong competitive asymmetry can in theory allow coexistence through a competition-colonization trade-off, but empirical evidence is inconsistent with this mechanism. Instead, the key advantage of large seeds appears to be their tolerance of stresses such as shade or drought that are present in some but not all regeneration sites. Here I present a simple, analytically tractable model of species coexistence in heterogeneous habitats through a tolerance-fecundity trade-off. Under this mechanism, the more tolerant species win all of the more stressful regeneration sites and some of those that are less stressful, whereas the more fecund species win most but not all of the less stressful sites. The tolerance-fecundity trade-off enables stable coexistence of large numbers of species in models with and without seed limitation. The tolerance-fecundity mechanism provides an excellent explanation for the maintenance of diversity of seed size within plant communities and also suggests new hypotheses for coexistence in animal and microbial communities.
引用
收藏
页码:4242 / 4247
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   OPTIMAL BALANCE BETWEEN SIZE AND NUMBER OF OFFSPRING [J].
SMITH, CC ;
FRETWELL, SD .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1974, 108 (962) :499-506
[42]   COMPETITION AND BIODIVERSITY IN SPATIALLY STRUCTURED HABITATS [J].
TILMAN, D .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (01) :2-16
[43]   Habitat destruction, dispersal, and deterministic extinction in competitive communities [J].
Tilman, D ;
Lehman, CL ;
Yin, CJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1997, 149 (03) :407-435
[44]   HABITAT DESTRUCTION AND THE EXTINCTION DEBT [J].
TILMAN, D ;
MAY, RM ;
LEHMAN, CL ;
NOWAK, MA .
NATURE, 1994, 371 (6492) :65-66
[45]  
Tilman David, 1993, P13
[46]   Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments [J].
Turnbull, LA ;
Crawley, MJ ;
Rees, M .
OIKOS, 2000, 88 (02) :225-238
[47]   Why equalising trade-offs aren't always neutral [J].
Turnbull, Lindsay A. ;
Rees, Mark ;
Purves, Drew W. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 11 (10) :1037-1046
[48]   The scaling of seed size [J].
Venable, D. Lawrence ;
Rees, Mark .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2009, 97 (01) :27-31
[49]   Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species [J].
Westoby, M ;
Falster, DS ;
Moles, AT ;
Vesk, PA ;
Wright, IJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2002, 33 :125-159
[50]  
Yu DW, 1998, ECOL LETT, V1, P193