Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading

被引:126
作者
Bendus, Allison E. Baxter
Mayer, Jacob F.
Shipley, Sharon K.
Catherino, William H.
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Muasher Ctr Fertil & IVF, Fairfax, VA USA
[3] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Howard & Georgeanna Jones Inst, Norfolk, VA 23507 USA
[4] Shady Grove Fertil & Reprod Sci Ctr, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
day; 3; embryos; cleaving stage embryos; embryo grading; in vitro fertilization; kappa scores;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Variations in pregnancy rates (PR) between IVF programs are due to multiple factors, including embryo quality. Standardized embryo grading systems have been developed to improve communication between embryologists and clinicians. However, these grading systems have not been validated. We sought to quantify both interobserver and intraobserver variability using a standardized day 3 embryo grading system (Veeck scale). Design: Prospective, sample-randomized, controlled, blinded study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Twenty-six practicing embryologists. Intervention(s): Observation and grading of 35 video clips of day 3 embryos. Main Outcome Measure(s): Interobserver and intraobserver variability. Embryologists were also assessed by education level, years of experience, size of IVF program, and type of grading system used. Kappa scores and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Result(s): Practicing embryologists differed from control (Lucinda Veeck) by as much as two grades, despite using the same grading system (Kappa = 0.24, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). There was also variability in grading the same embryo (Kappa = 0.69, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.88). Programs with higher cycle numbers per year had lower variability. Conclusion(s): There is substantial interobserver variability and moderate intraobserver variability among embryologists. Such variability could alter both the expected quality of embryos transferred, as well as the number transferred, both of which directly impact IVF program success.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Al-Aynati M, 2003, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V127, P593
[2]  
CUMMINS J M, 1986, Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, V3, P284, DOI 10.1007/BF01133388
[3]   Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study [J].
Desai, NN ;
Goldstein, J ;
Rowland, DY ;
Goldfarb, JM .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (10) :2190-2196
[4]   Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: Implications for assessment of tumor response [J].
Erasmus, JJ ;
Gladish, GW ;
Broemeling, L ;
Sabloff, BS ;
Truong, MT ;
Herbst, RS ;
Munden, RF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (13) :2574-2582
[5]   The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos [J].
Fisch, JD ;
Rodriguez, H ;
Ross, R ;
Overby, G ;
Sher, G .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (09) :1970-1975
[6]   Assessment of embryo viability: The ability to select a single embryo for transfer - a review [J].
Gardner, DK ;
Sakkas, D .
PLACENTA, 2003, 24 :S5-S12
[7]   Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial [J].
Gerris, J ;
De Neubourg, D ;
Mangelschots, K ;
Van Royen, E ;
Van de Meerssche, M ;
Valkenburg, M .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (10) :2581-2587
[8]   EVALUATION OF A NEW EMBRYO-GRADING SYSTEM TO PREDICT PREGNANCY RATES FOLLOWING IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION [J].
HOOVER, L ;
BAKER, A ;
CHECK, JH ;
LURIE, D ;
OSHAUGHNESSY, A .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1995, 40 (03) :151-157
[9]   Embryo implantation in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact of cleavage status, morphology grade, and number of embryos transferred [J].
Hsu, MI ;
Mayer, J ;
Aronshon, M ;
Lanzendorf, S ;
Muasher, S ;
Kolm, P ;
Oehninger, S .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 72 (04) :679-685
[10]   Quantification of microvessel density of breast carcinoma: an assessment of the inter- and intraobserver variation [J].
Ingeholm, P ;
Pedersen, L ;
Holck, S .
BREAST, 1999, 8 (05) :251-256