Interaction goals and social information processing: Underestimating one's partners but overestimating one's opponents

被引:12
作者
Chan, E [1 ]
Ybarra, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1521/soco.20.5.409.21126
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present experiments examined how the interaction goals of cooperation and competition affected social information processing. Study 1a and 1b evaluated whether people prefer to overestimate or underestimate another person's strengths when assessing a partner or an opponent. The findings indicated that people were inclined to underestimate how good their partners were but to overestimate how good their opponents were. In Study 2, consistent with the strategy selections from Study 1, the results showed that participants anticipating cooperation with another student remembered best information that was diagnostic of negative qualities than positive qualities. In contrast, participants expecting to compete with another student remembered best information that was diagnostic of positive qualities than negative qualities. In Study 3, participants had a chance to actively seek out information about a potential partner or opponent by selecting a subset of their behaviors to verify. The results provided a validation of the results from Study 2. The findings were discussed in terms of their implications for interpersonal and intergroup perception.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 439
页数:31
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BLACK-AND-WHITE STUDENTS IN INTERGROUP COOPERATION AND COMPETITION [J].
JOHNSON, DW ;
JOHNSON, RT .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 125 (04) :421-428
[12]  
Jones E.E., 1971, The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NEURES.2016.06.008
[13]   THE FRAMING OF COMPETENCE [J].
JONES, EE .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1989, 15 (04) :477-492
[14]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[15]  
Kerr N. L., 1999, RESOLVING SOCIAL DIL, P103
[16]  
Lassiter GD, 2000, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V36, P649, DOI 10.1006/jesp.2000.1428
[17]  
LEONE C, 1984, REPRESENTATIVE RES S, V13, P66
[18]   A CONSTANT ERROR APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL-PERCEPTION [J].
LEVY, LH ;
DUGAN, RD .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 61 (01) :21-24
[19]   Why and under what circumstances is a hypothesis-consistent testing strategy preferred in interviews? [J].
Leyens, JP ;
Dardenne, B ;
Fiske, ST .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 37 :259-274
[20]   PERCEIVED DISTRIBUTIONS OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF IN-GROUP AND OUT-GROUP MEMBERS - EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE AND A COMPUTER-SIMULATION [J].
LINVILLE, PW ;
SALOVEY, P ;
FISCHER, GW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (02) :165-188