BPH: social impact and patient's perspective

被引:11
作者
Emberton, Mark [1 ]
Martorana, Guiseppe
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Urol, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Urol, Alma Mater Studiorum, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
关键词
BPH; LUTS; quality of life; patients; partners;
D O I
10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in ageing men and although not a life-threatening disease, it can affect quality of life (QOL) to differing degrees. BPH progressively decreases patient self-esteem and lower urinary tract symptoms have also been shown to affect a patient's perceived sexuality. It has been shown that the impact of BPH on QOL is comparable to other disease conditions such as epilepsy requiring surgery and asthma, but worse, in certain aspects, than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. With regard to the effect that BPH has on the patient's partner, the morbidity reported was due to sleep disturbance, disruption of social life, psychological burden, inadequate sex life, and fear of surgery or prostate cancer. Factors that influence a patient's desire to seek treatment have been identified and include bother, interference with daily activities, symptom frequency, worry, and embarrassment; patients also have a major concern about acute urinary retention (AUR) and BPH-related surgery. The reasons patients with BPH chose one therapy over another have been studied and it appears that patients prefer rapid symptom improvement, reduction in prostate size, no side-effects, and a decrease in the risk of AUR and surgery. The strongest influence was side-effects and the most important benefit was reduction in prostate size. Physicians clearly influence the final treatment decision, but they should be aware of patient preferences and consider them when they discuss treatment options with the patient. (c) 2006 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 996
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Construct validation of the USA-Spanish version of the SF-36 health survey in a Cuban-American population with benign prostatic hyperplasia [J].
Arocho, R ;
McMillan, CA ;
Sutton-Wallace, P .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (02) :121-126
[2]  
BOSCH JLHR, 1995, UROLOGY, V46, P34
[3]   The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in men and women in four centres. The UrEpik study [J].
Boyle, P ;
Robertson, C ;
Mazzetta, C ;
Keech, M ;
Fourcade, R ;
Kiemeney, L ;
Lee, C .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (04) :409-414
[4]  
DaSilva FC, 1997, EUR UROL, V31, P272
[5]   Waiting for elective surgery: effects on health-related quality of life [J].
Derrett, S ;
Paul, C ;
Morris, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (01) :47-57
[6]  
Emberton M., 2005, European Urology Supplements, V4, P6, DOI 10.1016/S1569-9056(05)80025-9
[7]   Lower urinary tract symptoms in men: self-perceptions and the concept of bother [J].
Gannon, K ;
Glover, L ;
O'Neill, M ;
Emberton, M .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (06) :823-827
[8]   Patient-assessed measures of health outcome in asthma: A comparison of four approaches [J].
Garratt, AM ;
Hutchinson, A ;
Russell, I .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2000, 94 (06) :597-606
[9]   The importance of patient perception in the clinical assessment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its management [J].
Hong, SJ ;
Rayford, W ;
Valiquette, L ;
Emberton, M .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (01) :15-19
[10]   HEALTH-STATUS AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE OF BRITISH MEN WITH LOWER URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS - RESULTS FROM THE SF-36 [J].
HUNTER, DJW ;
MCKEE, M ;
BLACK, NA ;
SANDERSON, CFB .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (06) :962-971