The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks

被引:284
作者
Boutyline, Andrei [1 ]
Willer, Robb [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
political homophily; ideology; motivated cognition; Twitter; DISAGREEMENT; MEDIA; CONSEQUENCES; POLARIZATION; CONSERVATISM; ENGAGEMENT; IDENTITY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1111/pops.12337
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
We predict that people with different political orientations will exhibit systematically different levels of political homophily, the tendency to associate with others similar to oneself in political ideology. Research on personality differences across the political spectrum finds that both more conservative and more politically extreme individuals tend to exhibit greater orientations towards cognitive stability, clarity, and familiarity. We reason that such a preference for certainty may make these individuals more inclined to seek out the company of those who reaffirm, rather than challenge, their views. Since survey studies of political homophily face well-documented methodological challenges, we instead test this proposition on a large sample of politically engaged users of the social-networking platform Twitter, whose ideologies we infer from the politicians and policy nonprofits they follow. As predicted, we find that both more extreme and more conservative individuals tend to be more homophilous than more liberal and more moderate ones.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 569
页数:19
相关论文
共 82 条
[41]   Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use [J].
Iyengar, Shanto ;
Hahn, Kyu S. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2009, 59 (01) :19-U6
[42]   Are Diverse Political Networks Always Bad for Participatory Democracy? Indifference, Alienation, and Political Disagreements [J].
Jang, Seung-Jin .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (05) :879-898
[43]  
Jetten J., 2000, GROUP DYNAMICS, V4, P184
[44]   The end of the end of ideology [J].
Jost, John T. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 61 (07) :651-670
[45]   Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities [J].
Jost, John T. ;
Federico, Christopher M. ;
Napier, Jaime L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :307-337
[46]   Political conservatism as motivated social cognition [J].
Jost, JT ;
Glaser, J ;
Kruglanski, AW ;
Sulloway, FJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (03) :339-375
[47]   Exceptions that prove the rule - Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003) [J].
Jost, JT ;
Glaser, J ;
Ktuglanski, AW ;
Sulloway, FJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (03) :383-393
[48]   The structure and dynamics of movement participation [J].
Kim, HJ ;
Bearman, PS .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1997, 62 (01) :70-93
[49]   Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior [J].
Klofstad, Casey A. ;
Sokhey, Anand Edward ;
McClurg, Scott D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 57 (01) :120-134
[50]   NETWORKS OF POLITICAL-ACTION - TOWARD THEORY CONSTRUCTION [J].
KNOKE, D .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1990, 68 (04) :1041-1063