Reducing concentrate supplementation in dairy cow diets while maintaining milk production with pea-wheat intercrops

被引:23
作者
Adesogan, AT [1 ]
Salawu, MB
Williams, SP
Fisher, WJ
Dewhurst, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Wales, Inst Rural Sci, Aberystwyth SY23 3AL, Dyfed, Wales
[2] Inst Food Res, Inst Grassland & Environm Res, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, Dyfed, Wales
关键词
bi-crop; cereal-legume; rumen function; pea-wheat;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73475-X
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In the first of 2 experiments, 40 dairy cows were used to evaluate the milk production potential and concentrate-sparing effect of feeding dairy cows a basal diet of pea-wheat intercrop silages instead of perennial ryegrass silage (GS). Dairy cows were offered GS or 2 intercrop silages prepared from wheat and either Magnus peas (MW, a tall-straw variety) or Setchey peas (SW, a short-straw variety) ad libitum. The respective intercrops were supplemented with 4 kg/d of a dairy concentrate (CP = 240 g/kg dry matter; MW4 and SW4), and the GS were supplemented with 4 (GS4) or 8 (GS8) kg/d of the same concentrate. The second experiment measured the forage DM intake, digestibility, rumen function, and microbial protein synthesis from the forages by offering them alone to 3, nonlactating cows ( 3 x 3 Latin square design with 21-d periods). Forage dry matter intake was greater in cows fed the intercrop silages than those fed GS. Milk production was greater in cows fed SW4 than those fed GS4 or MW4, but similar to cows fed GS8. Dietary treatment did not affect milk fat, protein, or lactose concentrations. The intercrops had greater N retention, and were more digestible than the GS, and these factors probably contributed to the greater forage DM intakes and greater milk production from the intercrop silages compared with the GS. Rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations were similar across forages, but urinary purine derivative excretion was greater in the cows fed the intercrop silages than the GS, suggesting that rumen microbial protein synthesis was enhanced by feeding the intercrops. In conclusion, similar milk yield and milk composition can be obtained by feeding SW and 4 kg of concentrates as that obtained with GS and 8 kg of concentrates. Feeding intercrop silages instead of GS with the same amount of concentrates increased forage intakes, N retention, and microbial protein synthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:3398 / 3406
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 1. Production responses with different levels of concentrate [J].
Dewhurst, RJ ;
Fisher, WJ ;
Tweed, JKS ;
Wilkins, RJ .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2003, 86 (08) :2598-2611
[12]   Nitrate accumulation under pea cropping and the effects of crop establishment methods: A sustainability issue [J].
Evans, J ;
Fettell, NA ;
OConnor, GE .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1996, 36 (05) :581-586
[13]   Effects of increasing dietary protein on nutrient utilization in heifers [J].
Gabler, MT ;
Heinrichs, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2003, 86 (06) :2170-2177
[14]   Nutritive value of on-farm vetch-oat hays.: I.: Voluntary intake and nutrient digestibility [J].
Haj-Ayed, M ;
González, J ;
Caballero, R ;
Alvir, MR .
ANNALES DE ZOOTECHNIE, 2000, 49 (05) :381-389
[15]   Performance of lactating dairy cows fed alfalfa silage or perennial ryegrass silage [J].
Hoffman, PC ;
Combs, DK ;
Casler, MD .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1998, 81 (01) :162-168
[16]  
*IACR ROTH LAW AGR, 1997, GENST 5 WIND REL 4 1
[17]  
Jackson FS, 1996, J SCI FOOD AGR, V71, P103, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199605)71:1&lt
[18]  
103::AID-JSFA554&gt
[19]  
3.0.CO
[20]  
2-8