Significance of hepatic preneoplasia in risk identification and early detection of neoplasia

被引:66
作者
Bannasch, P
Haertel, T
Su, Q
机构
[1] Deutsch Krebsforschungszentrum, Dept Cellular & Mol Pathol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Tangdu Hosp, Dept Pathol, Xian 710032, Peoples R China
关键词
preneoplastic foci of altered hepatocytes; hepatocellular adenoma; hepatocellular carcinoma; carcinogenesis bioassays; primary prevention; secondary prevention;
D O I
10.1080/01926230390173923
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Among the different types of liver tumor, hepatocellular neoplasms predominate by far in both animals and man. Consequently, preneoplastic foci of altered hepatocytes (FAH), preceding both hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas, represent the most prevalent form of hepatic preneoplasia observed in animals for a long time, and identified in human chronic liver diseases associated with, or predisposing to, hepatocellular carcinomas more recently. Morphological, microbiochemical, and molecular biological approaches in situ revealed striking similarities in specific changes of the cellular phenotype of preneoplastic FAH developing in experimental and human hepatocarcinogenesis, irrespective of whether this was elicited by chemicals, hormones, viruses or radiation. The advantage of using FAH for risk identification (aiming at primary cancer prevention) in long-term and medium-term carcinogenesis bioassays has been well documented, but quantitative morphometric approaches appear to be indispensable for an appropriate evaluation of both bioassays. The detection of phenotypically similar FAH in various animal models and in humans prone to develop or bearing hepatocellular carcinomas favors the extrapolation from data obtained in animals to humans. Moreover, the recently reported frequent finding of FAH in fine-needle biopsies of patients suffering from chronic liver diseases opens new perspectives for secondary prevention of human hepatocellular carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 139
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]  
Feo F., 2000, DEHYDROEPIANDROSTERO, P215
[12]   HEPATOCYTE PROLIFERATION AND GENE-EXPRESSION INDUCED BY TRIIODOTHYRONINE IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO [J].
FRANCAVILLA, A ;
CARR, BI ;
AZZARONE, A ;
POLIMENO, L ;
WANG, ZQ ;
VANTHIEL, DH ;
SUBBOTIN, V ;
PRELICH, JG ;
STARZL, TE .
HEPATOLOGY, 1994, 20 (05) :1237-1241
[13]   Quantitative analysis of tumor initiation in rat liver:: role of cell replication and cell death (apoptosis) [J].
Grasl-Kraupp, B ;
Luebeck, G ;
Wagner, A ;
Löw-Baselli, A ;
de Gunst, M ;
Waldhör, T ;
Moolgavkar, S ;
Schulte-Hermann, R .
CARCINOGENESIS, 2000, 21 (07) :1411-1421
[14]   PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTORS - FINDING THE ORPHAN A HOME [J].
GREEN, S ;
WAHLI, W .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1994, 100 (1-2) :149-153
[15]   Interspecies comparison of liver carcinogenesis: Implications for cancer risk assessment [J].
Grisham, JW .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1997, 18 (01) :59-81
[16]   INDUCTION OF GLUTATHIONE-S-TRANSFERASE P-FORM IN PRIMARY CULTURED RAT HEPATOCYTES BY EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR AND INSULIN [J].
HATAYAMA, I ;
YAMADA, Y ;
TANAKA, K ;
ICHIHARA, A ;
SATO, K .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 1991, 82 (07) :807-814
[17]  
HUFF J, 1991, ANNU REV PHARMACOL, V31, P621
[18]  
ITO N, 1992, MECHANISMS CARCINOGE, P353
[19]   A model for hepatocarcinogenesis treating phenotypical changes in focal hepatocellular lesions as epigenetic events [J].
Kopp-Schneider, A ;
Portier, C ;
Bannasch, P .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 1998, 148 (02) :181-204
[20]  
Ledda-Columbano GM, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P603