Interactions between hydrophobic and ionic solutes in aqueous guanidinium chloride and urea solutions: Lessons for protein denaturation mechanism

被引:324
作者
O'Brien, Edward P.
Dima, Ruxandra I.
Brooks, Bernard
Thirumalai, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Inst Phys Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Biochem, Biophys Program, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] NIH, NHLBI, Lab Computat Biol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Chem, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja069232+
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In order to clarify the mechanism of denaturant-induced unfolding of proteins we have calculated the interactions between hydrophobic and ionic species in aqueous guanidinium chloride and urea solutions using molecular dynamics simulations. Hydrophobic association is not significantly changed in urea or guanidinium chloride solutions. The strength of interaction between ion pairs is greatly diminished by the guanidinium ion. Although the changes in electrostatic interactions in urea are small, examination of structures, using appropriate pair functions, of urea and water around the solutes show strong hydrogen bonding between urea's carbonyl oxygen and the positively charged solute. Our results strongly suggest protein denaturation occurs by the direct interaction model according to which the most commonly used denaturants unfold proteins by altering electrostatic interactions either by solvating the charged residues or by engaging in hydrogen bonds with the protein backbone. To further validate the direct interaction model we show that, in urea and guanidinium chloride solutions, unfolding of an unusually stable helix (H1) from mouse PrPC (residues 144-153) occurs by hydrogen bonding of denaturants to charged side chains and backbone carbonyl groups.
引用
收藏
页码:7346 / 7353
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The dominant interaction between peptide and urea is electrostatic in nature: A molecular dynamics simulation study [J].
Tobi, D ;
Elber, R ;
Thirumalai, D .
BIOPOLYMERS, 2003, 68 (03) :359-369
[42]   Keeping the shape but changing the charges: A simulation study of urea and its iso-steric analogs [J].
Tsai, J ;
Gerstein, M ;
Levitt, M .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 104 (23) :9417-9430
[43]   Hydrophobic and ionic interactions in nanosized water droplets [J].
Vaitheeswaran, S. ;
Thirumalai, D. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 128 (41) :13490-13496
[44]   Effect of the protein denaturants urea and guanidinium on water structure: A structural and thermodynamic study [J].
Vanzi, F ;
Madan, B ;
Sharp, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 120 (41) :10748-10753
[45]   Hydrophobic interactions in aqueous urea solutions with implications for the mechanism of protein denaturation [J].
Wallqvist, A ;
Covell, DG ;
Thirumalai, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 120 (02) :427-428
[46]   A Kirkwood-Buff derived force field for mixtures of urea and water [J].
Weerasinghe, S ;
Smith, PE .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2003, 107 (16) :3891-3898
[47]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PAIR AND BULK HYDROPHOBIC INTERACTIONS [J].
WOOD, RH ;
THOMPSON, PT .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (03) :946-949
[48]   Aggregation and dispersion of small hydrophobic particles in aqueous electrolyte solutions [J].
Zangi, Ronen ;
Berne, B. J. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2006, 110 (45) :22736-22741
[49]   CD and NMR studies of prion protein (PrP) helix 1 -: Novel implications for its role in the PrPC→PrPSc conversion process [J].
Ziegler, J ;
Sticht, H ;
Marx, UC ;
Müller, W ;
Rösch, P ;
Schwarzinger, S .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 278 (50) :50175-50181
[50]  
ZUO Q, 1998, PROTEIN-STRUCT FUNCT, V31, P107