The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction

被引:40
作者
Mustonen, P
Lepistö, J
Papp, A
Berg, M
Pietiläinen, B
Kataja, V
Härmä, M
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[4] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
来源
EJSO | 2004年 / 30卷 / 08期
关键词
immediate reconstruction; breast cancer; local recurrence;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2004.06.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim. The aim of our study was to (1) examine the incidence of surgical complications, (2) determine the incidence of loco-regional recurrences and (3) examine the safety of saving the nipple-areola-complex after immediate breast reconstructions in breast cancer. Methods. Sixty-six immediate breast reconstructions were performed. Wide local excision (WLE), skin sparing mastectomy and subcutaneous mastectomy (SCM) were performed to 12, 20 and 34 patients, respectively. In all patients with WLE the reconstruction was performed with the latissimus dorsi (LD) miniflap. In other patients reconstructions were done with a free TRAM-flap (n = 26), LD-flap (n = 27) or with a prosthesis only (n = 1). Results. Major flap necrosis developed in four patients. Local recurrence rate was 8.3% in the group where nipple-areola-complex was removed and 7.1% in the group where nipple-areola-complex was saved. Metastases were found in 12.5 and 0%, respectively. Conclusion. SCM compared to skin sparing mastectomy may lead to an enhanced risk of immediate surgical complications, but does not threat the oncological safety. Saving the nipple-areola-complex in immediate breast reconstructions is possible in early breast cancer, if the tumour is not in the central part of the breast. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 823
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction [J].
Alderman, AK ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Lowery, JC ;
Kim, M ;
Davis, JA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (04) :769-776
[2]   Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis [J].
Benediktsson, KP ;
Perbeck, L ;
Geigant, E ;
Solders, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 50 (06) :443-449
[3]   Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? [J].
Cense, HA ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Cardozo, ML ;
Van Lanschot, JJB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 27 (06) :521-526
[4]   Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap [J].
Chang, DW ;
Youssef, A ;
Cha, SM ;
Reece, GP .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 110 (03) :751-759
[5]   Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas [J].
Clough, KB ;
Lewis, JS ;
Couturaud, B ;
Fitoussi, A ;
Nos, C ;
Falcou, MC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 237 (01) :26-34
[6]   Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap [J].
Clough, KB ;
Louis-Sylvestre, C ;
Fitoussi, A ;
Couturaud, B ;
Nos, C .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (06) :1904-1911
[7]   Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. TRAM flap reconstruction [J].
Clough, KB ;
O'Donoghue, JM ;
Fitoussi, AD ;
Vlastos, G ;
Falcou, MC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (07) :1710-1716
[8]   Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: A 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients [J].
Delay, E ;
Gounot, N ;
Bouillot, A ;
Zlatoff, P ;
Rivoire, M .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (05) :1461-1478
[9]  
Disa JJ, 1999, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V104, P97, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199907000-00014
[10]   Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery [J].
Gendy, RK ;
Able, JA ;
Rainsbury, RM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (04) :433-439