Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice

被引:42
作者
Jorge, JMN
Habr-Gama, A
Wexner, SD
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Colorectal Surg, Weston, FL 33331 USA
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Coloproctol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
biofeedback; anal manometry; constipation; anal sphincters; fecal incontinence; anorectal physiology;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022316900628
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In coloproctology, biofeedback has been used for more than 20 years to treat patients with fecal incontinence, constipation, and rectal pain. It can be performed in a number of conditions with minimal risk and discomfort. However, it does require the presence of some degree of sphincter contraction and rectal sensitivity. Biofeedback can be time-consuming and demands motivation. The purpose of this paper is to review the indications, methodology, and results of anorectal biofeedback in the treatment of these disorders. Mean success rates for biofeedback range from 72.3% for fecal incontinence of diverse etiology, 68.5% for constipation attributable to paradoxical puborectalis syndrome, and 41.2% for idiopathic rectal pain. However, criteria to define success vary tremendously among researchers and there is a tendency to indicate biofeedback in a myriad of conditions when other therapeutic options, including surgery, fail or are inappropriate. These factors make comparison of the results difficult and reinforce the need for randomized controlled trials and studies assessing long-term follow-up. In summary, biofeedback is a simple, cost-effective, and morbidity-free technique and remains an attractive option, especially considering the complexity of the functional disorders of the colon, rectum, anus, and pelvic floor.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 61
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]   Prospective trial of pelvic floor retraining in patients with fecal incontinence [J].
Rieger, NA ;
Wattchow, DA ;
Sarre, RG ;
Cooper, SJ ;
Rich, CA ;
Saccone, GTP ;
Schloithe, AC ;
Toouli, J ;
McCall, JL .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (07) :821-826
[52]   Prospective study of biofeedback for treatment of constipation [J].
Rieger, NA ;
Wattchow, DA ;
Sarre, RG ;
Saccone, GTP ;
Rich, CA ;
Cooper, SJ ;
Marshall, VR ;
McCall, JL .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (10) :1143-1148
[53]   CAN MANOMETRIC PARAMETERS PREDICT RESPONSE TO BIOFEEDBACK THERAPY IN FECAL INCONTINENCE [J].
SANGWAN, YP ;
COLLER, JA ;
BARRETT, RC ;
ROBERTS, PL ;
MURRAY, JJ ;
SCHOETZ, DJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (10) :1021-1025
[54]  
SIELEZNEFF I, 1994, PRESSE MED, V23, P1691
[55]  
SIPROUDHIS L, 1995, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V7, P547
[56]  
SOUSA A, 1994, DIS COLON RECTUM, V37, pP24
[57]   ANAL-SPHINCTER BIOFEEDBACK RELAXATION TREATMENT FOR WOMEN WITH INTRATABLE CONSTIPATION SYMPTOMS [J].
TURNBULL, GK ;
RITVO, PG .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1992, 35 (06) :530-536
[58]   Randomised trial of biofeedback training for encopresis [J].
vanderPlas, RN ;
Benninga, MA ;
Redekop, WK ;
Taminiau, JA ;
Buller, HA .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1996, 75 (05) :367-374
[59]   Biofeedback treatment is ineffective in neurogenic fecal incontinence [J].
vanTets, WF ;
Kuijpers, JHC ;
Bleijenberg, G .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (09) :992-994
[60]   ANORECTAL SENSORIMOTOR DYSFUNCTION IN FECAL INCONTINENCE AND DIABETES-MELLITUS - MODIFICATION WITH BIOFEEDBACK THERAPY [J].
WALD, A ;
TUNUGUNTLA, AK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (20) :1282-1287