The Deinstitutionalization of American marriage

被引:996
作者
Cherlin, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Sociol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
cohabitation; marriage; remarriage; same-sex marriage;
D O I
10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This article argues that marriage has undergone a process of deinstitutionalization-a weakening of the social norms that define partners' behavior-over the past few decades. Examples are presented involving the increasing number and complexity of cohabiting unions and the emergence of same-sex marriage. Two transitions in the meaning of marriage that occurred in the United States during the 20th century have created the social context for deinstitutionalization. The first transition, noted by Ernest Burgess, was from the institutional marriage to the companionate marriage. The second transition was to the individualized marriage in which the emphasis on personal choice and self-development expanded. Although the practical importance of marriage has declined, its symbolic significance has remained high and may even have increased. It has become a marker of prestige and personal achievement. Examples of its symbolic significance are presented. The implications for the current state of marriage and its future direction are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 861
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [11] Bumpass L. L., 1991, J MARRIAGE FAM, V53, P338
  • [12] BUMPASS LL, 1995, DEMOGRAPHY, V32, P1
  • [13] Burgess E.W. Locke., 1945, The family: From institution to companionship
  • [14] Cancian F. M., 1987, LOVE AM GENDER SELF
  • [15] CARRINGTON C, 1987, NO PLACE LIKE HOME R
  • [16] REMARRIAGE AS AN INCOMPLETE INSTITUTION
    CHERLIN, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1978, 84 (03) : 634 - 650
  • [17] Cherlin A. J., 2000, The Ties thatBind, P126
  • [18] Cherlin Andrew., 1992, Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage
  • [19] Daley S, 2000, N Y Times Web
  • [20] DAVIS J, 2003, GEN SOCIAL SURVEY 19