Resampling methods in sparse sampling situations in preclinical pharmacokinetic studies

被引:32
作者
Mager, H [1 ]
Göller, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Bayer AG, Pharma Res Ctr, D-42096 Wuppertal, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1021/js970114h
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Toxicokinetic studies often require destructive sampling and the determination of drug concentrations in the various organs. Classically, the corresponding information is summarized in one mean concentration-time profile, which is regarded as representative for the animal population. On the basis of a mean profile, only estimates of the secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (for example AUC, t(1/2)) but no variability measures may be obtained. In this paper two resampling techniques are contrasted to Bailer's approach. The results obtained show that the resampling techniques can be considered a reliable alternative to Bailer's approach for the estimation of the standard error of the AUCl(o)(tk) in the case of normally distributed concentration data. They can be extended to the estimation of a variety of other secondary pharmacokinetic parameters and their respective standard deviations. One disadvantage with Bailer's method is its restriction to linear functions of the concentrations. On the other hand, using the population approach, prior knowledge of the underlying pharmacokinetic model is necessary. The resampling techniques discussed here, the "pseudoprofile-based bootstrap" (PpbB) and the "pooled data bootstrap" (PDB), are noncompartmental approaches. They are applicable under nonnormal data constellations and permit the estimation of the usual secondary pharmacokinetic parameters along with their standard deviations, standard errors, and other statistical measures. To assess the accuracy, precision, and robustness of the resampling estimators, theoretical data from three different pharmacokinetic models with different add-on errors (up to 100% variability) were analyzed. Even for the data sets with high variability, the parameters calculated with resampling techniques differ not more than 10% from the true values. Thus, in the case of data that are not normally distributed or when additional secondary pharmacokinetic parameters and their variability are to be estimated, the resampling methods are powerful tools in the safety assessment in preclinical pharmacokinetics and in toxicokinetics where generally sparse data situations are given.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 378
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   ESTIMATION OF POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS USING DESTRUCTIVELY OBTAINED EXPERIMENTAL-DATA - A SIMULATION STUDY OF THE ONE-COMPARTMENT OPEN MODEL [J].
LINDSTROM, FT ;
BIRKES, DS .
DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1984, 15 (1-2) :195-264
[12]   ANALYSIS OF PSEUDO-PROFILES IN ORGAN PHARMACOKINETICS AND TOXICOKINETICS [J].
MAGER, H ;
GOLLER, G .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (9-10) :1009-1024
[13]  
MAGER H, 1993, 2 INT M ASU BIOPH GR
[14]  
MAGER H, 1982, MODERNE REGRESSIONSA
[15]  
Mammen Enno., 1992, When Does Bootstrap Work?
[16]  
NEDDELMAN JR, 1995, PHARMACEUT RES, V12, P124
[17]   Characterization of AUCs from sparsely sampled populations in toxicology studies [J].
Pai, SM ;
Fettner, SH ;
Hajian, G ;
Cayen, MN ;
Batra, VK .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 13 (09) :1283-1290
[18]   OPTIMUM NUMERICAL-INTEGRATION METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF AREA-UNDER-THE-CURVE (AUC) AND AREA-UNDER-THE-MOMENT-CURVE (AUMC) [J].
PURVES, RD .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1992, 20 (03) :211-226
[19]  
Rowland M., 2011, Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Concepts and Applications, V4th ed.
[20]  
Seber G. A. F., 1989, Nonlinear Regression