Accounting for measurement error: A critical but often overlooked process

被引:149
作者
Harris, Edwayd F. [1 ]
Smith, Richayd N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Orthodont, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Clin Dent Sci, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
Measurement error; Reliability; Validation; Correlation; HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; COMPARING METHODS; CUSP AREAS; RELIABILITY; IDENTIFICATION; MEDICINE; BLAND; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.04.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aims: Due to instrument imprecision and human inconsistencies, measurements are not free of error. Technical error of measurement (TEM) is the variability encountered between dimensions when the same specimens are measured at multiple sessions. A goal of a data collection regimen is to minimise TEM. The few studies that actually quantify TEM, regardless of discipline, report that it is substantial and can affect results and inferences. This paper reviews some statistical approaches for identifying and controlling TEM. Statistically, TEM is part of the residual ('unexplained') variance in a statistical test, so accounting for TEM, which requires repeated measurements, enhances the chances of finding a statistically significant difference if one exists. Methods: The aim of this paper was to review and discuss common statistical designs relating to types of error and statistical approaches to error accountability. This paper addresses issues of landmark location, validity, technical and systematic error, analysis of variance, scaled measures and correlation coefficients in order to guide the reader towards correct identification of true experimental differences. Conclusions: Researchers commonly infer characteristics about populations from comparatively restricted study samples. Most inferences are statistical and, aside from concerns about adequate accounting for known sources of variation with the research design, an important source of variability is measurement error. Variability in locating landmarks that define variables is obvious in odontometrics, cephalometrics and anthropometry, but the same concerns about measurement accuracy and precision extend to all disciplines. With increasing accessibility to computer-assisted methods of data collection, the ease of incorporating repeated measures into statistical designs has improved. Accounting for this technical source of variation increases the chance of finding biologically true differences when they exist. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S107 / S117
页数:11
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
ADAMS JW, 1940, ANGLE ORTHOD, V10, P3
[2]  
Agresti A., 2018, An introduction to categorical data analysis
[3]   MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Experimental design-procedures for the behavioral Sciences
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BIOSTATISTICAL ANAL
[6]  
Athanasiou AE., 1995, ORTHODONTIC CEPHALOM
[7]   RELIABILITY OF HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS .1. LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION [J].
BAUMRIND, S ;
FRANTZ, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1971, 60 (02) :111-&
[8]   RELIABILITY OF HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS .2. CONVENTIONAL ANGULAR AND LINEAR MEASURES [J].
BAUMRIND, S ;
FRANTZ, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1971, 60 (05) :505-&
[9]   RELIABILITY OF HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS .3. TRACING SUPERIMPOSITION [J].
BAUMRIND, S ;
MILLER, D ;
MOLTHEN, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1976, 70 (06) :617-644
[10]  
BERGERSEN EO, 1980, ANGLE ORTHOD, V50, P230