Accounting for measurement error: A critical but often overlooked process

被引:149
作者
Harris, Edwayd F. [1 ]
Smith, Richayd N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Orthodont, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Clin Dent Sci, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
Measurement error; Reliability; Validation; Correlation; HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; COMPARING METHODS; CUSP AREAS; RELIABILITY; IDENTIFICATION; MEDICINE; BLAND; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.04.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aims: Due to instrument imprecision and human inconsistencies, measurements are not free of error. Technical error of measurement (TEM) is the variability encountered between dimensions when the same specimens are measured at multiple sessions. A goal of a data collection regimen is to minimise TEM. The few studies that actually quantify TEM, regardless of discipline, report that it is substantial and can affect results and inferences. This paper reviews some statistical approaches for identifying and controlling TEM. Statistically, TEM is part of the residual ('unexplained') variance in a statistical test, so accounting for TEM, which requires repeated measurements, enhances the chances of finding a statistically significant difference if one exists. Methods: The aim of this paper was to review and discuss common statistical designs relating to types of error and statistical approaches to error accountability. This paper addresses issues of landmark location, validity, technical and systematic error, analysis of variance, scaled measures and correlation coefficients in order to guide the reader towards correct identification of true experimental differences. Conclusions: Researchers commonly infer characteristics about populations from comparatively restricted study samples. Most inferences are statistical and, aside from concerns about adequate accounting for known sources of variation with the research design, an important source of variability is measurement error. Variability in locating landmarks that define variables is obvious in odontometrics, cephalometrics and anthropometry, but the same concerns about measurement accuracy and precision extend to all disciplines. With increasing accessibility to computer-assisted methods of data collection, the ease of incorporating repeated measures into statistical designs has improved. Accounting for this technical source of variation increases the chance of finding biologically true differences when they exist. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S107 / S117
页数:11
相关论文
共 93 条
[21]  
BUSCHANG PH, 1987, ANGLE ORTHOD, V57, P168
[22]  
Cameron N., 1984, MEASUREMENT HUMAN GR
[23]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[24]  
Cohen J., 2013, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES
[25]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, V2nd
[26]   CEPHALOMETRIC ERRORS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN REPEAT MEASUREMENTS AND RETAKEN RADIOGRAPHS [J].
COOKE, MS ;
WEI, SHY .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1991, 36 (01) :38-43
[27]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302
[28]  
Dahlberg G., 1940, Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students.
[29]  
Dahlberg Gunnar., 1926, Twin Births and Twins from a Hereditary Point of View
[30]  
DETERRA M, 1905, BEITRAGE ODONTOGRAPH