Patient preferences for axillary dissection in the management of early-stage breast cancer

被引:17
作者
Galper, SR
Lee, SJ
Tao, ML
Troyan, S
Kaelin, CM
Harris, JR
Weeks, JC
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Adult Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/92.20.1681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Recent data on the value of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer and promising early data on less invasive strategies for managing the axilla have raised questions about the appropriate role of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the management of early-stage breast cancer. We sought to evaluate how women weigh potential benefits of ALND-prognostic information, enhanced local control, and tailored therapy-against the risks of long-term morbidity that are associated with the procedure. Methods: We used hypothetical scenarios to survey 82 randomly selected women with invasive breast cancer who had been treated with ALND and 62 women at risk for invasive breast cancer by virtue of a history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who had not undergone ALND, Results: Women in both the invasive cancer and the DCIS groups required substantial improvements in local control of the cancer (5% and 15%, respectively) and overall survival (3% and 10%, respectively) before they would opt for this procedure. Women with invasive cancer would choose ALND if it had only a 1% chance of altering treatment recommendations, whereas DCIS subjects required a 25% chance. Sixty-eight percent and 29% of women in the invasive cancer and DCIS groups, respectively, would accepted a 40% risk of arm dysfunction to gain prognostic information that would not change treatment. Conclusions: For most subjects treated previously for invasive breast cancer and almost half those at risk of the disease, the potential benefits of ALND, particularly the value of prognostic information, were sufficient to outweigh the risks of morbidity, However, women varied considerably in their preferences, highlighting the need to tailor decisions regarding management of the axilla to individual patients' values.
引用
收藏
页码:1681 / 1687
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1992, LANCET, V339, P71
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, AJCC CANC STAG MAN
[3]   KNOWING FOR THE SAKE OF KNOWING - THE VALUE OF PROGNOSTIC INFORMATION [J].
ASCH, DA ;
PATTON, JP ;
HERSHEY, JC .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :47-57
[4]   WHAT DO PATIENTS VALUE - WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR ULTRASOUND IN NORMAL-PREGNANCY [J].
BERWICK, DM ;
WEINSTEIN, MC .
MEDICAL CARE, 1985, 23 (07) :881-893
[5]   NEW THERAPEUTIC POSSIBILITIES IN PRIMARY INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER [J].
CADY, B ;
STONE, MD ;
WAYNE, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (03) :338-349
[6]  
CELLA D F, 1988, Comprehensive Therapy, V14, P69
[7]  
Cox D., 1989, Analysis of Binary Data
[8]   Does information from axillary dissection change treatment in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer? - An algorithm for assessment of impact of axillary dissection [J].
Dees, EC ;
Shulman, LN ;
Souba, WW ;
Smith, BL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (03) :279-286
[9]   CONSERVATION TREATMENT OF EARLY BREAST-CANCER - LONG-TERM RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS [J].
DELOUCHE, G ;
BACHELOT, F ;
PREMONT, M ;
KURTZ, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1987, 13 (01) :29-34
[10]   Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Dignam, J ;
Wolmark, N ;
DeCillis, A ;
Emir, B ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Bryant, J ;
Dimitrov, NV ;
Abramson, N ;
Atkins, JN ;
Shibata, H ;
Deschenes, L ;
Margolese, RG .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (22) :1673-1682