Dynamic capabilities: What are they?

被引:1397
作者
Eisenhardt, KM [1 ]
Martin, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
dynamic capabilities; competitive advantage; resource-based view; dynamic markets; resources; high-velocity markets; organization theory; organizational change;
D O I
10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 [经济学];
摘要
This paper focuses on dynamic capabilities and, more generally, the resource-based view of the firm. We argue that dynamic capabilities are a set of specific and identifiable processes such as product development, strategic decision making, and alliancing. They are neither vague nor tautological. Although dynamic capabilities are idiosyncratic in their details and path dependent in their emergence, they have significant commonalities across firms (popularly termed 'best practice'). This suggests that they are more homogeneous, fungible, equifinal and substitutable than is usually assumed. In moderately dynamic markets, dynamic capabilities resemble the traditional conception of routines. They are detailed, analytic stable processes with predictable outcomes. In contrast, in high-velocity markets, they are simple, highly experiential and fragile processes with unpredictable outcomes. Finally, well-known learning mechanisms guide the evolution of dynamic capabilities. In moderately dynamic markets, the evolutionary emphasis is on variation. In high-velocity markets, it is on selection. At the level of REV, we conclude that traditional REV misidentifies the locus of long-term competitive advantage in dynamic markers, overemphasizes the strategic logic of leverage, and reaches a boundary condition in high-velocity markets. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1121
页数:17
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]
Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]
Allen T, 1971, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
[3]
Allen T. J., 1977, Managing the Flow of Technology -Technological Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within R
[4]
STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT [J].
AMIT, R ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) :33-46
[5]
BRIDGING THE BOUNDARY - EXTERNAL ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (04) :634-665
[6]
Argote Linda., 2012, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, V2nd
[7]
FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[9]
Brown S.L., 1998, COMPETING EDGE STRAT
[10]
The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J].
Brown, SL ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (01) :1-34