The ambiguous relationship between practice variation and appropriateness of care: An agenda for further research

被引:24
作者
Casparie, AF
机构
[1] Inst. for Hlth. Plcy. and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam
关键词
small area variation; practice variation; appropriateness of care; quality of care;
D O I
10.1016/0168-8510(95)00787-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The analysis of variation in the use of health care services, and particularly of practice variation, has been the subject of renewed interest because of the view that the inappropriate use of procedures could be a major cause of these differences. In this article, recent literature is reviewed and the results of personal research are described on both the variation in care provision and on appropriateness assessment. In the few studies which have focussed on both subjects no evidence has yet been found to suggest that practice variation is to be explained by differences in appropriateness rates. However, there are still many methodological pitfalls in both variation analyses (statistical problems) and appropriateness assessment (reliability of the judgement), implying that this conclusion is far from definitive. More research should therefore be conducted on methodological questions of variation analysis and appropriateness assessment. Furthermore in variation analysis the relative contribution of all potential determinants has to be studied on the various levels of care provision. Finally, to study the relationship between practice variation and appropriateness of care, the clinical problem and not the procedure should be the starting point.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 265
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   THE APPROPRIATENESS OF PERFORMING CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND CORONARY-ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION IN A SWEDISH POPULATION [J].
BENGTSON, A ;
HERLITZ, J ;
KARLSSON, T ;
BRANDRUPWOGNSEN, G ;
HJALMARSON, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (16) :1260-1265
[2]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PRACTICE STYLE - A DUTCH STUDY OF GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS [J].
BENSING, JM ;
VANDENBRINKMUINEN, A ;
DEBAKKER, DH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (03) :219-229
[3]   THE APPROPRIATENESS OF HYSTERECTOMY - A COMPARISON OF CARE IN 7 HEALTH PLANS [J].
BERNSTEIN, SJ ;
MCGLYNN, EA ;
SIU, AL ;
ROTH, CP ;
SHERWOOD, MJ ;
KEESEY, JW ;
KOSECOFF, J ;
HICKS, NR ;
BROOK, RH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (18) :2398-2402
[4]   THE APPROPRIATENESS OF USE OF CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY IN NEW-YORK-STATE [J].
BERNSTEIN, SJ ;
HILBORNE, LH ;
LEAPE, LL ;
FISKE, ME ;
PARK, RE ;
KAMBERG, CJ ;
BROOK, RH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (06) :766-769
[5]   THE APPROPRIATENESS OF CORONARY PROCEDURES IN SWEDEN [J].
BERNSTEIN, SJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (16) :1254-1255
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF GENDER ON PHYSICIAN PRACTICE STYLE [J].
BERTAKIS, KD ;
HELMS, LJ ;
CALLAHAN, EJ ;
AZARI, R ;
ROBBINS, JA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1995, 33 (04) :407-416
[7]  
BROOK RH, 1988, LANCET, V1, P750
[8]   QUALITY-OF-CARE ASSESSMENT - CHOOSING A METHOD FOR PEER REVIEW [J].
BROOK, RH ;
APPEL, FA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1973, 288 (25) :1323-1329
[9]  
CAIN KC, 1993, HLTH SERVICES RES, V27, P267
[10]   EFFECT OF OUTCOME ON PHYSICIAN JUDGMENTS OF APPROPRIATENESS OF CARE [J].
CAPLAN, RA ;
POSNER, KL ;
CHENEY, FW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (15) :1957-1960